Section 3 AAC 107.760 - Review criteria for full proposals(a) The criteria for reviewing full proposals must include how well the full proposal addresses the statutory priorities at AS 42.45.375, and (1) the feasibility of the proposed technology;(2) the innovation and quality of the technical explanations submitted;(3) how well the proposed project will test emerging energy technologies, test methods of conserving energy, improve an existing energy technology, or deploy an existing technology that has not previously been demonstrated in the state;(4) how well the proposed project addresses the priority considerations established for projects under the request for grant applications;(5) how the proposed project will demonstrate the energy technology;(6) whether the proposed schedule is realistic;(7) whether the energy technology can be beneficial when deployed in the state;(8) how suitable the proposed project site is;(9) the extent to which existing research and development demonstrates the energy technology and the systems and components included are likely to successfully work in the proposed location and environment in the state;(10) the extent to which the proposed project will advance the commercialization of the energy technology not later than the next five years;(11) the capabilities of the project team;(12) the potential commercial market for the proposed technology or energy from the technology;(13) an evaluation of the finance plan and budget for the proposed project; and(14) whether all regulatory and legal issues have been adequately addressed.(b) The authority may reject a full proposal based upon the review under this section and AS 42.45.375. The authority will provide written notice to the applicant of the rejection. The notice may be given by electronic mail.Eff. 1/26/2012, Register 201Authority:AS 42.45.375
AS 44.83.080