Example 1.A In a given calendar year before 2022, a producer has three producing leases or properties on the North Slope and no non-producing leases or properties on the North Slope. The producer also conducts seismic exploration on the North Slope in a location remote from and unrelated to any of the leases or properties.
Ten barrels of taxable oil with a gross value at the point of production of $500, and qualifying for a gross value reduction of 20 percent under AS 43.55.160(f), are produced during the year from Property A. The producer incurs adjusted lease expenditures during the year of $400 to develop and produce oil from Property A.
Twenty barrels of taxable oil with a gross value at the point of production of $1,000, not qualifying for a gross value reduction, and 10 BTU equivalent barrels of taxable gas used in the state with a gross value at the point of production of $610 are produced during the year from Property B. The producer incurs adjusted lease expenditures during the year of $1,800 to develop and produce oil and gas from Property B.
Thirty barrels of taxable oil with a gross value at the point of production of $1,500, not qualifying for a gross value reduction, are produced during the year from Property C. The producer incurs adjusted lease expenditures during the year of $2,000 to develop and produce oil from Property C.
The producer incurs adjusted lease expenditures during the year of $140 to conduct the off-lease seismic exploration.
An annual production tax value must be calculated for each of two segments in this example:
The gross value at the point of production for the first segment is the sum of $500, less a 20 percent gross value reduction, or $400 from Property A, plus $1,000 from Property B, plus $1,500 from Property C, for a total of $2,900. Adjusted lease expenditures applicable to this segment are the sum of $400 from Property A, plus $1,200 from Property B (because under 15 AAC 55.215(d), the lease expenditures to develop and produce oil and gas from Property B are allocated between the oil and the gas used in the state proportionally to the respective BTU equivalent barrels produced, of which oil accounts for 20/30 = 2/3 of the $1,800 lease expenditures = $1,200), plus $2,000 from Property C, plus $120 from the seismic exploration (because under 15 AAC 55.215(e), those lease expenditures are allocated between the oil produced from both Properties A, B, and C, on one hand, and the gas used in the state produced from Property B, on the other hand, proportionally to the respective BTU equivalent barrels produced, of which oil accounts for 60/70 = 6/7 of the $140 lease expenditures = $120), for a total of $3,720. Since the lease expenditures exceed the gross value at the point of production, the annual production tax value for the segment is zero. Hence, the producer is required to follow the procedure set out in (b) of this section to determine the producer's carried-forward annual losses, if any, for this segment.
The gross value at the point of production for the second segment is $610, for gas used in the state produced from Property B. The lease expenditures applicable to this segment are the sum of $600 from Property B (because under 15 AAC 55.215(d), one-third of the lease expenditures incurred to develop and produce oil and gas from Property B are allocated to gas used in the state produced from Property B), plus $20 from the seismic exploration (because under 15 AAC 55.215(e), 1/7 of those lease expenditures are allocated to the gas used in the state produced from Property B), for a total of $620. Since the lease expenditures exceed the gross value at the point of production, the annual production tax value for the segment is zero. Hence, the producer is required to follow the procedure set out in (b) of this section to determine the producer's carried-forward annual losses, if any, for this segment.
For the first segment:
SE = $3,600-$3,000 = $600
PE for Property B = $200
PE for Property C = $500
TE for Property B = $200 * 6/7 = $171.43
TE for Property C = $500 * 6/7 = $428.57
F for Property C = $428.57 / $2,000 = 21.428%
Therefore, under (b)(3)(A)(i) of this section, the producer has a carried-forward annual loss for the segment in the amount of $171.43, established by 14.286 percent of the producer's $1,200 in adjusted lease expenditures incurred to explore for, develop, or produce oil or gas deposits located within Property B and allocated to oil produced from Property B. (That is to say, 14.3 percent of each of those lease expenditures is carried-forward, rather than the producer's identifying a subset of lease expenditures with a total dollar amount of $171.43 to carry forward.) The producer has a second carried-forward annual loss for the segment in the amount of $428.57, established by 21.428 percent of the producer's $2,000 in adjusted lease expenditures incurred to explore for, develop, or produce oil or gas deposits located within Property C. In addition, as provided by (b)(3)(A)(ii) of this section, the producer has a third carried-forward annual loss for the segment in the amount of $120, established by the producer's $120 in adjusted lease expenditures incurred to explore for oil or gas deposits located in North Slope land other than the producer's leases or properties and allocated to oil and gas other than gas used in the state.
For the second segment:
YE = $10
H = $10-$20 = 50%
Therefore, under (b)(3)(C) of this section, the producer has a carried-forward annual loss for the segment in the amount of $10, established by 50 percent of the producer's $20 in adjusted lease expenditures incurred to explore for oil or gas deposits located within North Slope land other than the producer's leases or properties and allocated to gas used in the state. (It is assumed for purposes of (b)(4) of this section that the production does not have a positive annual production tax value for the segment described in 15 AAC 55.206(c)(1)(F) for the calendar year, so that the fraction calculated under 15 AAC 55.224(f)(7) equals one.)
Example l.B. In a given calendar year after 2021, a producer has three producing leases or properties on the North Slope and no non-producing leases or properties on the North Slope. The producer also conducts seismic exploration on the North Slope in a location remote from and unrelated to any of the leases or properties.
Ten barrels of taxable oil with a gross value at the point of production of $500, and qualifying for a gross value reduction of 20 percent under AS 43.55.160(f), are produced during the year from Property A. The producer incurs adjusted lease expenditures during the year of $400 to develop and produce oil from Property A.
Twenty barrels of taxable oil with a gross value at the point of production of
$1,000, not qualifying for a gross value reduction, and IQ BTU equivalent barrels of taxable gas used in the state with a gross value at the point of production of $610 are produced during the year from Property B. The producer incurs adjusted lease expenditures during the year of $1,800 to develop and produce oil and gas from Property
Thirty barrels of taxable oil with a gross value at the point of production of $1,500, not qualifying for a gross value reduction, are produced during the year from Property C. The producer incurs adjusted lease expenditures during the year of $2,000 to develop and produce oil from Property C.
The producer incurs adjusted lease expenditures during the year of $140 to conduct the off-lease exploration.
An annual production tax value must be calculated for oil, produced from North Slope leases or properties, under 15 AAC 55.206fc)(3)(A). No production tax value is calculated for gas, including gas used in the state, since gas, including gas used in the state, is taxed at rate of 13 percent of the gross value at the point of production as provided in AS 43.55.011(e)(3) fB), and the levy of tax for gas used in the state is limited as provided in AS 43.55.01 l(o). Additionally, beginning January 1, 2022, lease expenditures to produce both oil and gas, including gas used in the state, are all attributable to the production tax value of oil for North Slope leases or properties as provided in AS 43.55.160(hKl).
The gross value at the point of production for the first segment is the sum of $500, less a 20 percent gross value reduction of $100, for a gross value at the point of production of $400 from Property A, plus $1,000 from Property B, plus SI,500 from Property C, for a total of $2.900. Adjusted lease expenditures applicable to this segment are the sum of $400 from Property A, plus $1,800 from Property B. plus $2.000 from Property C ($400 Property A + $1,800 Property B + $2,000 Property C = $4,200 from producing leases or properties), plus $140 from the seismic exploration (total adjusted lease expenditures is $4,200 from Properties A, B, and C + $140 seismic exploration = $4,340). Since the lease expenditures exceed the gross value at the point of production for the oil, the annual production tax value for the segment is zero. Hence, the producer is required to follow the procedure set out in (b) of this section to determine the producer's carried-forward annual losses, if any, for this segment.
The gross value at the point of production for gas used in the state produced from Property B is $610. As provided in AS 43.55.160(h)(1) the lease expenditures to produce gas used in the state arc attributable to oil produced from the teases or properties.
For the oil segment:
SE = $4,200 - $3,000 = $1,200
PE for Property B = $800
PE for Property C = $500
Sum of PEs = $1,300
O = $1,200 1,300 = 92.31%
TE for Property B = $800 * 92.31% = $738.46
TE for Property C = $500 * 92.31% = $461.54
F for Property B = $738.46 $1,800 = 41.03%
F for Property C = $461.55 ÷ $2,000 = 23.08%
Therefore, under (b)(3)(A)(i) of this section, the producer has a carried-forward annual loss for the segment attributable to Properties B and C in the amount of $1,200, established by 41.03 percent of the producer's $1,800 in adjusted lease expenditures incurred to explore for, develop, or produce oil or gas deposits located within Property B and allocated to oil produced from Property B. (That is to say. 41.03 percent of each of those lease expenditures is carried-forward, rather than the producer's identifying a subset of lease expenditures with a total dollar amount of $738.46 to carry forward.) The producer has a second carried-forward annual loss for the segment in the amount of $461.54, established by 23.08 percent of the producer's $2,000 in adjusted lease expenditures incurred to explore for, develop, or produce oil or gas deposits located within Property C. In addition, as provided by (b)f3)fA)(ii) of this section, the producer has a third carried-forward annual loss for the segment (that is not attributable to any of the producing leases or properties) in the amount of $140, established bv the producer's $140 in adjusted lease expenditures incurred to explore for oil or gas deposits located in North Slope land other than the producer's leases or properties and attributable to oil as provided in AS 43.55.160(h)(1) for a total carried-forward annual loss for the segment in the amount of $1,340.
For the gas used in the state there is no carried-forward annual loss because as of January 1, 2022, the lease expenditures to produce gas used in the state are attributable to the production tax value of oil produced from those leases or properties as provided in AS 43.55.160(h).
Example 2. In a given calendar year, a producer has one lease or property on the North Slope, Property D, from which no oil or gas is produced. The producer incurs adjusted lease expenditures of $1,000 to explore for or develop oil and gas deposits located within the lease or property. The producer also incurs adjusted lease expenditures of $200 to conduct seismic exploration on the North Slope in a location remote from and unrelated to the lease or property.
Under 15 AAC 55.206(c)(2)(A), for a calendar year before 2022, or 15 AAC 55.206(c)(4) for a calendar year after 2021, the relevant segment is the area of the state north of 68 degrees North latitude. The production tax value for the segment is zero, but since the segment is not a segment under either 15 AAC 55.206(c)(1), for a calender year before 2022, or 15 AAC 55.206(c)(3) for a calendar year after 2021, the producer need not use the procedure set out in (b) of this section to determine carried-forward annual losses for the segment. The producer has a carried-forward annual loss for the segment in the amount of $1,000, established by the producer's $1,000 in adjusted lease expenditures incurred to explore for or develop oil or gas deposits located within Property D. The producer also has a carried-forward annual loss for the segment in the amount of $200, established by the producer's $200 in adjusted lease expenditures incurred to explore for oil or gas deposits located within North Slope land other than the producer's leases or properties. The carried-forward annual loss of $1,000 for Property D may not be applied in determining production tax value for the segment until the calendar year in which regular production of oil or gas from the lease or property commences as provided in AS 43.55.165(p) t2). Similarly, the carried-forward annual loss of $200 for the remote seismic exploration may not be included in determining the production tax value for the segment until regular production of oil or gas has commenced from leases or properties that are reasonably related to the remote seismic exploration as provided in AS 43.55.165(n)(2) and (r).
Example 1. In a given calendar year before 2022, a producer has two producing leases or properties on the North Slope, both of which have commenced regular production (Property A and Property B). The producer also has two non-producing leases or properties on the North Slope, neither of which has commenced regular production (Property C and Property D). Oil and gas other than gas used in the state produced from the four properties make up the first segment of taxable production for the producer. The producer also has taxable production from a second segment on the North Slope for gas used in the state produced from Property A. For purposes of this example, it has been assumed that if any of the properties are eligible for a gross value reduction under AS 43.55.160(f) or AS 43.55.160(f) and (g), any gross value reduction has been added back to the gross value at the point of production before determining the amount of any carried-forward annual loss under this section. Additionally, the producer has no lease expenditures or production outside of the North Slope.
In Year 1, the producing leases or properties. Property A and Property B, respectively, produce 30 and 20 barrels of taxable oil with gross values at the point of production of $1,500 and $1,000, and adjusted lease expenditures of $1,800 and $1,200. Property A also produces six BTU equivalent barrels of taxable gas used in the state with a gross value at the point of production of $200. The non-producing properties. Property C and Property D incur adjusted lease expenditures of $300 and $500, respectively.
In Year 2, the producing leases or properties. Property A and Property B, respectively, produce 50 and 25 barrels of taxable oil with gross values at the point of production of $2,750 '.1 and $1,375, and adjusted lease expenditures of $2,400 and $1,200. Property A also produces 10 BTU equivalent barrels of taxable gas used in the state with a gross value at the point of production of $500. The non-producing properties, Propeity C and Property D incur adjusted lease expenditures of $400 and $600, respectively.
In Year 3, the producing leases or properties. Property A and Property B, respectively, produce 50 barrels and 30 barrels of taxable oil with gross values at the point of production of $3,000 and $1,800, and adjusted lease expenditures of $2,400 and $1,200. Property A also produces 10 BTU equivalent barrels of taxable gas used in the state with a gross value at the point of production of $500. In addition, during Year 3, Property C commences regular production and for the North Slope oil and gas, other than gas used in the state segment, produces 20 barrels of taxable oil with a gross value at the point of production of $1,200 and incurs adjusted lease expenditures of $1,300. In addition. Property C produces six BTU equivalent barrels of gas used in the state, with a gross value at the point of production of $ 150. Non-producing Property D incurs adjusted lease expenditures of $600.
In Year 1, the producer has a loss for the first segment of $1,000. The $1,800 in adjusted lease expenditures for Property A are allocated to the first segment. North Slope oil and gas other than gas used in the state, in the amount of $1,500 ($1,800 * (30/(30 + 6))) and $300 to the second segment, gas used in the state for Property A ($1,800 * (6/(30 + 6))). Part or all of the $200 carried-forward annual loss established by lease expenditures incurred on Property B may be deducted in determining the annual production tax value for the first segment in any following year to the extent that the gross value at the point of production for the segment exceeds the adjusted lease expenditures described in AS 43.55.165(a)(1) or (2) for the segment for the calendar year subject to AS 43.55.165(m). The carried-forward annual losses of $300 established by lease expenditures incurred on Property C, and $500 established by lease expenditures incurred on Property D, may not be applied in determining the annual production tax value for the segment until the respective Property has commenced regular production. For the gas used in the state segment for Property A, the producer has a carried-forward annual loss of $100. Since there are no other North Slope properties from which gas used in the state was produced and it was previously stated that the producer does not have any other lease expenditures or production outside of the North Slope that might result in a positive annual production tax value for the segment described in 15 AAC 55.206(c)(1)(F) for the calendar year, the fraction calculated under 15 AAC 55.224(f)(7) equals one.
In Year 2, the producer has a loss for the first segment, in the amount of $75. The lease expenditures establishing the loss are those incurred on the non-producing properties (Property C and Property D) as provided by (b)(3)(B) of this section. The $2,400 in adjusted lease expenditures from Property A is allocated to the North Slope oil or gas, other than gas used in the state segment, in the amount of $2,000 to Property A ($2,400 * (50/(50 + 10))) and $400 to the gas used in the state segment of Property A ($2,400 * (10/(50 + 10))). Since the amount of lease expenditures for the calendar year for the North Slope oil and gas, other than gas used in the state segment, required to exceed the gross value at the point of production includes costs from producing and non-producing properties, the adjusted lease expenditures incurred on the non-producing properties are used to establish any carried-forward annual losses based on the calculations in (b)(3)(B) of this section, where XE = $75 (amount of the loss for the North Slope oil and gas, other than gas used in the state, segment) and AE = $1,000 (the sum of the adjusted lease expenditures from leases or properties from which no oil or gas is produced), resulting in a fraction G, of .075. Applying the fraction G of .075 to the adjusted lease expenditures of $400 incurred on Property C and $600 incurred on Property D results in carried-forward annual losses in the amounts of $30 established by lease expenditures incurred on Property C and $45 established by lease expenditures incurred on Property D. Those carried-forward annual losses may not be applied to the segment until the respective property commences regular production. For the gas used in the state segment for Property A, the gross calue at the point of production (GVPP) of $500 exceeds the adjusted lease expenditures of $400, so there is no carried-forward annual loss. Additionally, the $100 carried-forward annual loss for gas used in the state from Property A from Year 1 may be applied against the $100 production tax value in Year 2 to reduce production tax value to zero. Since there are no excess lease expenditures for the gas used in the state segment for Property A the calculations under 15 AAC 55.224(f) are not relevant.
In Year 3, the producer has a positive production tax value for the North Slope oil and gas, other than gas used in the state segment, before deducting any available carried-forward annual losses, in the amount of $1,200. For the North Slope oil and gas, other than gas used in a the state segment, there is no carried-forward annual loss created in Year 3. The adjusted lease expenditures from Property A are allocated to the North Slope oil and other gas, other than gas used in the state segment, in the amount of $2,000 to Property A ($2,400 * (50/(50 + 10))) and $400 to the gas used in the state segment for Property A 2400 * (10/50 +10))). The adjusted lease expenditures for Property C of $1,300 are allocated to the North Slope oil and other gas, other than gas used in the state segment, in the amount of $1,000 to Property A ($1,300 * (20/20 + 6))) and $300 to the gas used in the state segment, in the amount of $1,000 to Property A C ($1,300 * (6/(20 + 6))). For the North Slope oil and gas, other than gas used in the state segment, the amount of tax levied by AS 43.55.011(e) is $420 if no carried-forward annual losses from prior years are deducted (($6,000 GVPP - $4,800 adjusted lease expenditures) *_ 35%). Since the minimum tax for the North Slope oil and gas, other than gas used in the state segment, as determined under AS 43.55.011(f) is $240 ($6,000 gross value at the point of production * [X] 4%), the producer may use any available carried-forward annual losses from Property B ($200), plus those from Property C ($300) from Year 1, plus an additional $ 14 from Property C (Year 2) to reduce the producer's production tax liability, before the application of any tax credits, to no less than the $240 minimum tax determined under AS 43.55.011(f).
For the gas used in the state segment for Propeity A, the amount of production tax A. calculated under AS 43,55.011(e)(2) is $35 (($500 GVPP - $400 adjusted lease expenditures)*- 35%). However, this amount is limited under AS 43,55,011(o) to $10 (10=BTU equivalent barrels * _ (6 MMBTUs/BTU Eq. Bbl./,037,000 BTUs/Mcf)) = 58 Mcf. (58 Mcf * $. 177= $10)). For the gas used in the state segment for Property C the producer is determined to have incurred excess lease expenditures under 15 AAC 55.206(b) in the amount of $150 ($150 GVPP - adjusted lease expenditures of $300). As previously noted, the producer does not have any other lease expenditures or production outside of the North Slope that might result in a positive annual production tax value for the segment described in 15 AAC 55.206(c)(1)(F). Therefore, the amount of the carried-forward annual loss would be determined under 15 AAC 55.224(f) as follows:
$150 = 15 AAC 55.224(f)(1) - Total amount of excess lease expenditures gas used in
$ 53 = 15 AAC 55.224(f)(2) - ((15 AAC 55.224(f)(1) *_ 35%))
$ 25 = 15 AAC 55.224(f)(3) & (4) - sum of benefit of limitation under AS 43.55.011(o) & (p)
$28 = 15 AAC 55.224(f)(5)-Difference ((15 AAC 55.224(f)(2)-15 AAC 55.224(f)(4))
$ 79 = 15 AAC 55.224(f)(6) - ((15 AAC 55.224(f)(5)/35%))
0.53 = 15 AAC 55.224(f)(7) - ratio to be applied to excess lease expenditures in 15 AAC 55.224(f)(1) ((15 AAC 55.224(f)(6)/15 AAC 55.224(f)(1)))
In accordance with (b)(4) of this section the 53 percent ratio in 15 AAC 55.224(f)(7) is applied to the $150 excess less expenditures from gas used in the state Property C resulting in a carried-forward annual loss of $79 for the segment.
Example 2. In a given calendar year after 2021, a producer has two producing leases or properties on the North Slope, both of which have commenced regular production. Property A and Property B. The producer also has two nonproducing leases or properties on the North Slope, neither of which has commenced regular production. Property' C and Property D. Oil produced from the four properties make up the first segment of taxable oil production for the producer. The producer also has taxable production on the North Slope for gas used in the state produced from Property A. For purposes of this example it has been assumed that if any of the properties are eligible for a gross value reduction under AS 43.55.160(f) or AS 43.55.160(f) and (g), any gross value reduction has been added back to the gross value at the point of production before determining the amount of any carried-forward annual loss under this section. Additionally, the producer has no lease expenditures or production outside of the North Slope.
In Year 1, the producing leases or properties. Property A and Property B, respectively, produce 30 and 20 barrels of taxable oil with gross values at the point of production of $1,500 and $1,000, and adjusted lease expenditures of $1,800 and Sl,20Q. Property A also produces six BTU equivalent barrels of taxable gas used in the state with a gross value at the point of production of $200. The non-producing properties. Property C and Property D incur adjusted lease expenditures of $300 and $500, respectively.
In Year 2, the producing leases or properties. Property A and Property B, respectively, produce 50 and 25 barrels of taxable oil with gross values at the point of production of $2,750 and $1,375, and adjusted lease expenditures of $2,400 and $1,200. Property A also produces 10 BTU equivalent barrels of taxable gas used in the state with a gross value at the point of production of $500. The non-producing properties. Property C and Property D incur adjusted lease expenditures of $400 and $600, respectively.
In Year 3, the producing leases or properties. Property A and Property B, respectively, produce 50 barrels and 30 barrels of taxable oil with gross values at the point of production of $3,000 and $1,800, and adjusted lease expenditures of $2,400 and $1,200. Property A also produces 10 BTU equivalent barrels of taxable gas used in the state with a gross value at the point of production of $500. In addition, during Year 3, Property C commences regular production and for the North Slope oil segment, produces 20 barrels of taxable oil with a gross value at the point of production of $1,200 and incurs adjusted lease expenditures of $1,300. In addition. Property C produces six BTU equivalent barrels of gas used in the state, with a gross value at the point of production of $150. Non-producing Property D incurs adjusted lease expenditures of $600.
In Year 1 the producer has a loss for the oil segment of $1,300. Part or all of the $300 carried-forward annual loss established by lease expenditures incurred on Property A, or $200 carried-forward annual loss established by lease expenditures incurred on Property B, may be deducted in determining the annual production tax value for the oil segment in any following year to the extent that the gross value at the point of production for the segment exceeds the adjusted lease expenditures described in AS 43.55.165(a)(1) or (2) for the segment for the calendar year, subject to AS 43.55.165(m). The carried-forward annual losses of $300 established by lease expenditures incurred on Property C, and $500 established by lease expenditures incurred on Property D, may not be applied in determining the annual production tax value for the oil segment until the respective Property has commenced regular production.
For the gas used in the state produced from Property A, there is no carried-forward annual loss as the lease expenditures to produce gas used in the state are attributable to oil produced from the leases or properties, as provided in AS 43.55.160(h)(1). The tax for the gas used in the state is $6 as limited by AS 43.55.01 l(o) because that is less than the $26 calculated under AS 43.55.011(e)(3)(B).
In Year 2, the producer has a loss for the oil segment, in the amount of $475. The lease expenditures establishing the loss arc those incurred on the non-producing properties. Property C and Property D, as provided by (h)(3)(B) of this section. The $2,400 in adjusted lease expenditures from Property A is attributable to the North Slope oil segment. Since the amount of lease expenditures for the calendar year for the North Slope oil segment, required to exceed the gross value at the point of production includes costs from producing and non-producing properties, the adjusted lease expenditures incurred on the non-producing properties are used to establish any carried-forward annual losses based on the calculations in (b)(3)(B) of this section, where XE = $475 (amount of the loss for the North Slope oil segment) and AE = $1,000 (the sum of the adjusted lease expenditures from leases or properties from which no oil or gas is produced), resulting in a fraction G, of .475. Applying the fraction G of .475 to the adjusted lease expenditures of $400 incurred on Property C and $600 incurred on Property D results in carried-forward annual losses in the amounts of $190 established by lease expenditures incurred on Property C and $285 established by lease expenditures incurred on Property D. Those carried-forward annual losses may not be applied to the segment until the respective property commences regular production as provided in AS 43.55.165(n)(2).
For the gas used in the state produced from Property A, the lease expenditures to produce gas used in the state are attributable to the oil segment, so there is no carried-forward annual loss for gas used in the state. The tax for the gas used in the state is $10 as limited by AS 43.S5.011(o) because that is less than the $65 calculated under AS 43.55.011(e)(3)(B).
In Year 3, the producer has a positive production tax value for the North Slope oil segment, before deducting any available carried-forward annual losses, in the amount of S500. For the North Slope oil segment, there is no carried-forward annual loss created in Year 3. The adjusted lease expenditures from Property A are attributable to the North Slope oil segment, in the amount of $2,400. The adjusted lease expenditures for Property C of $1,300 are attributable to the North Slope oil segment. For the North Slope oil segment, the amount of tax levied by AS 43.55.011(e) is $175 if no carried-forward annual losses from prior years are deducted (($6,000 GVPP - $5,500 adjusted lease expenditures) * 35%). Since the minimum tax for the North Slope oil segment, as determined under AS 43.55.011(f) is $240 ($6,000 gross value at the point of production * 4%), is greater than the tax under AS 43.55.011(e), the producer must pay the minimum tax under AS 43.55.011(f) and may not apply any carried-forward annual losses from prior years.
For the gas used in the state produced from Property A, the amount of production tax calculated under AS 43.55.011(e)(3) is $65 ($500 GVPP * 13%). However, this amount is limited under AS 43.55.01 Ko) to $10 (10 BTU equivalent barrels * (6 MMBTUs/BTU Eq. Bbl./1,037,000 BTUs/Mcf)) = 58 Mcf. (58 Mcf * $177 = $10).
For the gas used in the state produced from Property C the amount of production tax calculated under AS 43.55.011(e)(3)(B) is $20 (150 GVPP * 13%). However, this amount is limited under AS 43.55.011(o) to $6 (6 BTU equivalent barrels * (6 MMBTUs/BTU Eq. Bbl./1,037.000 BTUs/Mcf)) = 35 Mcf. (35 Mcf* $.177 = $6).
In a given calendar year, a producer has two producing leases or properties on the North Slope, both of which have commenced regular production (Property A and Property B). The producer also has two non-producing leases or properties on the North Slope, neither of which has commenced regular production (Property C and Property D). Oil and gas other than gas used in the state produced from the four properties make up the first segment of taxable production for the producer. The producer also has taxable production from a second segment on the North Slope for gas used in the state produced from Property A. For purposes of this example it has been assumed that if any of the properties are eligible for a gross value reduction under AS 43.55.160(f) or AS 43.55.160(f) and (g), any gross value reduction has been added back to the gross value at the point of production prior to determining the amount of any carried-forward annual loss under this section. Additionally, the producer has no lease expenditures or production outside of the North Slope.
In Year 1, the producing leases or properties, Property A and Property B, respectively, produce 30 and 20 barrels of taxable oil with gross values at the point of production of $1,500 and $1,000, and adjusted lease expenditures of $1,800 and $1,200. Property A also produces six BTU equivalent barrels of taxable gas used in the state with a gross value at the point of production of $200. The non-producing properties, Property C and Property D incur adjusted lease expenditures of $300 and $500, respectively.
In Year 2, the producing leases or properties, Property A and Property B, respectively, produce 50 and 25 barrels of taxable oil with gross values at the point of production of $2,750 and $1,375, and adjusted lease expenditures of $2,400 and $1,200. Property A also produces 10 BTU equivalent barrels of taxable gas used in the state with a gross value at the point of production of $500. The non-producing properties. Property C and Property D incur adjusted lease expenditures of $400 and $600, respectively.
In Year 3, the producing leases or properties, Property A and Property B, respectively, produce 50 barrels and 30 barrels of taxable oil with gross values at the point of production of $3,000 and $1,800, and adjusted lease expenditures of $2,400 and $1,200. Property A also produces 10 BTU equivalent barrels of taxable gas used in the state with a gross value at the point of production of $500. In addition, during Year 3, Property C commences regular production and for the North Slope oil and gas, other than gas used in the state segment, produces 20 barrels of taxable oil with a gross value at the point of production of $1,200 and incurs adjusted lease expenditures of $1,300. In addition, Property C produces six BTU equivalent barrels of gas used in the state, with a gross value at the point of production of $150. Non-producing Property D incurs adjusted lease expenditures of $600.
In Year 1 the producer has a loss for the first segment of $1,000. The $1,800 in adjusted lease expenditures for Property A are allocated to the first segment, North Slope oil and gas other than gas used in the state, in the amount of $1,500 ($1,800*(30/(30 + 6))) and $300 to the second segment, gas used in the state for Property A ($1,800*(6/(30 + 6))) Part or all of the $200 carried-forward annual loss established by lease expenditures incurred on Property B may be deducted in determining the annual production tax value for the first segment in any following year to the extent that the gross value at the point of production for the segment exceeds the adjusted lease expenditures described in AS 43.55.165(a)(1) or (2) for the segment for the calendar year subject to AS 43.55.165(m). The carried-forward annual losses of $300 established by lease expenditures incurred on Property C, and $500 established by lease expenditures incurred on Property D, may not be applied in determining the annual production tax value for the segment until the respective Property has commenced regular production. For the gas used in the state segment for Property A, the producer has a carried-forward annual loss of $100. Since there are no other North Slope properties from which gas used in the state was produced and it was previously stated that the producer does not have any other lease expenditures or production outside of the North Slope that might result in a positive annual production tax value for the segment described in 15 AAC 55.206(c)(1)(F) for the calendar year, the fraction calculated under 15 AAC 55.224(f)(7) equals one.
In Year 2, the producer has a loss for the first segment, in the amount of $75. The lease expenditures establishing the loss are those incurred on the non-producing properties (Property C and Property D) as provided by (b)(3)(B) of this section. The $2,400 in adjusted lease expenditures from Property A is allocated to the North Slope oil or gas, other than gas used in the state segment, in the amount of $2,000 to Property A ($2,400 * (50/(50 + 10))) and $400 to the gas used in the state segment for Property A ($2,400 * (10/(50 + 10))). Since the amount of lease expenditures for the calendar year for the North Slope oil and gas, other than gas used in the state segment, required to exceed the gross value at the point of production includes costs from both producing and non-producing properties, the adjusted lease expenditures incurred on the non-producing properties are used to establish any carried-forward annual losses based on the calculations in (b)(3)(B) of this section, where XE = $75 (amount of the loss for the North Slope oil and gas, other than gas used in the state, segment) and AE = $1,000 (the sum of the adjusted lease expenditures from leases or properties from which no oil or gas is produced), resulting in a fraction G, of .075. Applying the fraction G of .075 to the adjusted lease expenditures of $400 incurred on Property C and $600 incurred on Property D results in carried-forward annual losses in the amounts of $30 established by lease expenditures incurred on Property C and $45 established by lease expenditures incurred on Property D. Those carried-forward annual losses may not be applied to the segment until the respective property commences regular production.
For the gas used in the state segment for Property A, the GVPP of $500 exceeds the adjusted lease expenditures of $400, so there is no carried-forward annual loss. Additionally, the $100 carried-forward annual loss for gas used in the state from Property A from Year 1 may be applied against the $100 production tax value in Year 2 to reduce production tax value to zero. Since there are no excess lease expenditures for the gas used in the state segment for Property A the calculations under 15 AAC 55.224(f) are not relevant.
In Year 3 the producer has a positive production tax value for the North Slope oil and gas, other than gas used in the state segment, before deducting any available carried-forward annual losses, in the amount of $1,200. For the North Slope oil and gas, other than gas used in the state segment, there is no carried-forward annual loss created in Year 3. The adjusted lease expenditures from Property A are allocated to the North Slope oil and other gas, other than gas used in the state segment, in the amount of $2,000 to Property A ($2,400 * (50/(50 + 10))) and $400 to the gas used in the state segment for Property A ($2,400 * (10/(50 + 10))). The adjusted lease expenditures for Property C of $1,300 are allocated to the North Slope oil and other gas, other than gas used in the state segment, in the amount of $1,000 to Property A ($ 1,300 * (20/(20 + 6))) and $300 to the gas used in the state segment tor Property C ($1,300 * (6/(20 + 6))). For the North Slope oil and gas, other than gas used in the state segment, the amount of tax levied by AS 43.55.011(e) is $420 if no carried-forward annual losses from prior years are deducted ($6,000 GVPP - $4,800 adjusted lease expenditures) X 35%))). Since the minimum tax for the North Slope oil and gas, other than gas used in the state segment, as determined under AS 43.55.011(f) is $240 ($6,000 gross value at the point of production X 4%), the producer may use any available carried-forward annual losses from Property B ($200), plus those from Property C ($300) from Year 1, plus an additional $14 from Property C (Year 2) to reduce the producer's production tax liability, before the application of any tax credits, to no less than the $240 minimum tax determined under AS 43.55.011(f).
For the gas used in the state segment for Property A, the amount of production lax calculated under AS 43.55.011(e)(2) is $35 (($500 GVPP - $400 adjusted lease expenditures) X 35%)). However, this amount is limited under AS 43.55.011(o) to $10 (((10 BTU equivalent barrels X (6 MMBTUs/BTU Eq. Bbl./1,037,000 BTUs/Mcf)) = 58 Mcf. (58 Mcf X $.177 = $10)). For the gas used in the state segment for Property C the producer is determined to have incurred excess lease expenditures under 15 AAC 55.206(b) in the amount of $150 ($150 GVPP - adjusted lease expenditures of $300). As previously noted, the producer does not have any other lease expenditures or production outside of the North Slope that might result in a positive annual production tax value for the segment described in 15 AAC 55.206(c)(1)(F). Therefore, the amount of the carried-forward annual loss would be determined under 15 AAC 55.224(f) as follows:
$150 = 15 AAC 55.224(f)(1) - Total amount of excess lease expenditures gas used in state
$ 53 =15 AAC 55.224(f)(2) - (15 AAC 55.224(f)(1) X 35%))
$ 25 =15 AAC 55.224(f)(3)&(4) - sum of benefit of limitation under AS 43.55.011(o) & (p)
$ 28 =15 AAC 55.224(f)(5) - Difference ((15 AAC 55.224(f)(2) - 15 AAC 55.224(f)(4)))
$ 79 =15 AAC 55.224(f)(6) - ((15 AAC 55.224(f)(5)/ 35%))
0.53 = 15 AAC 55.224(f)(7) - ratio to be applied to excess lease expenditures in 15 AAC 55.224(f)(1)((15 AAC 55.224(f)(6)/ 15 AAC 55.224C(f)(1)))
In accordance with (b)(4) of this section the 53%) ratio in 15 AAC 55.224(f)(7) is applied to the $150 excess less expenditures from gas used in the state Property C resulting in a carried-forward annual loss of $79 for the segment.
Example. In a given calendar year before 2022, a producer has two producing leases or properties on the North Slope, both of which have commenced regular production (Property E and Property F). The producer also has two non-producing leases or properties on the North Slope, neither of which has commenced regular production (Property G and Property H). Oil and other gas produced from the two producing properties plus the adjusted lease expenditures for all four properties make up the first segment of taxable production for the producer. The producer also has taxable production for the second segment on the North Slope for gas used in the state produced from Property E. For purposes of this example, it has been assumed that if any of the properties are eligible for a gross value reduction under AS 43.55.160(f) or AS 43.55.160(f) and (g), any gross value reduction has been added back to the gross value at the point of production before determining the amount of any carried-forward annual loss under this section. Additionally, the producer has no lease expenditures or production outside of the North Slope.
In Year 1, the producing leases or properties. Property E and Property F, respectively, produce 30 and 20 barrels of taxable oil with gross values at the point of production of $1,500 and $1,000, and adjusted lease expenditures of $1,800 and $1,200. Property E also produces six BTU equivalent barrels of taxable gas used in the state with a gross value at the point of production of $200, The non-producing properties. Property G and Property H incur adjusted lease expenditures of $300 and $500, respectively.
In Year 2, the producing leases or properties. Property E and Property F, respectively, produce 50 and 25 barrels of taxable oil with gross values at the point of production of $2,750 and $1,375, and adjusted lease expenditures of $2,400 and $1,200. Property E also produces 10 BTU equivalent barrels of taxable gas used in the state with a gross value at the point of production of $500. The non-producing properties, Property G and Property H incur adjusted lease expenditures of $400 and $600, respectively.
In Year 3, the producing leases or properties. Property E and Property F, respectively, produce 50 barrels and 30 barrels of taxable oil with gross values at the point of production of $3,000 and $1,800, and adjusted lease expenditures of $2,400 and $1,200. Property E also produces 10 BTU equivalent barrels of taxable gas used in the state with a gross value at the point of production of $500. In addition, during Year 3, Property G commences regular production of oil and gas for the North Slope segment, producing 20 barrels of taxable oil with a gross value at the point of production of $ 1,200 and incurs adjusted lease expenditures of $1,300. In addition. Property G produces six BTU equivalent barrels of gas used in the state, with a gross value at the point of production of $150. Non-producing Property H incurs adjusted lease expenditures of $600. The producer wishes to deduct the carried-forward annual losses to the maximum extent possible in calculating annual production tax values for a later calendar year.
In Year 1, first segment, for which adjusted lease expenditures established the $200, $300, and $500 of carried-forward annual losses, for properties F, G, and H, respectively, is oil and gas, other than gas used in the state, produced from leases or properties that include land north of 68 degrees North latitude, under 15 AAC 55.206(c)(1)(A). Since regular production has already commenced from Property F, and subject to AS 43.55.165(n)(l), the carried-forward 1/. C. annual losses established by those lease expenditures may be deducted in calculating the annual production tax value for oil and gas, other than gas used in the state, produced from leases or properties that include land north of 68 degrees North latitude in any subsequent calendar year.
Since regular production of oil or gas has not yet commenced from either Properties G or H, the $300 and $500 carried-forward annual losses incurred year 1 and established by lease expenditures incurred to explore for or develop oil or gas deposits located within Properties G and H may be deducted only after regular production of oil or gas has commenced from those leases or properties, as provided in AS 43.55.165(n)(2) and (p)(2) of this section. In addition, the amounts of any or all of the carried-forward losses are potentially subject to reduction under AS 43:55.165(0).
The second segment, gas used in the state, for which adjusted lease expenditures established the $100 carried-forward annual loss, is gas used in the state produced from Property E, under 15 AAC 55.206(c)(1)(E). Therefore, subject to AS 43.55.165(o), this carried-forward annual loss may be deducted in calculating the annual production tax value of gas used in the state in any future period before 2022.
In Year 2, there is a loss for the first segment, oil and other gas, in the amount of $75. The $2,400 in adjusted lease expenditures for Property E is allocated on a BTU Equivalent basis to oil and other gas ($2,400 * (50/(50 + 10))) = $2,000. $2,000 + $1,200 Property F + $400 Property G + $600 Property H = adjusted lease expenditures for the oil and other gas segment of $4,200 subtracted for the GVPP of Properties E, $2,750 and F, $ 1,375 = a carried-forward annual loss of $75. This carried-forward annual loss is allocated between Properties G and H as in 15 AAC 55.217(d) as XE = $75 an AE = $1,000 for a Factor G of .075 which is applied to the loss in properties G and H as $400 * .075 = $30 and $600 * .075 = $45 for a total carried-forward annual loss for the segment of $75. The carried-forward annual loss for gas used in the state from Property calculated as ($2,400 *(10/610/660+10)))= $400 allocated to the segment as adjusted lease expenditures, subtracted from the $500 gross value at the point of production to yield a positive production tax value of $100. Applying the carried-forward annual loss from Property E in Year 1 results in a production tax value of zero for gas used in the state produced from Property E in Year 2.
In Year 3, there is a positive production tax value for the first segment, oil and other gas, in the amount of $1,200. The $2,400 in adjusted lease expenditures for Property E is allocated on a BTU Equivalent basis to oil and other gas ($2,400 * (50/(50+10)))= $2,000. $2,000 + $1,200 Property F + $1,000 Property G + $600 Property H = adjusted lease expenditures for the oil and other gas segment of $4,800 subtracted from the GVPP of Properties E, $3,000, F, $1,800 plus G, $1,200 (total $6,000) = a positive production tax value of $1,200. In accordance with AS 43.55.165(m) a carried-forward annual loss may not be used to reduce a tax below the amount calculated under AS 43.55.011(f) ($6,000 * 4% = $240). $240 .35 (tax rate) = $686 the desired production tax value needed to equal the minimum tax under AS 43.55.01 1(f): $1,200 - $686 = $514. Therefore, a total carried-forward annual loss from Properties F and G (since regular production has commenced from both of those leases or properties) in the amount of $514 may be applied against the production tax value of $1,200 reducing that to $686. $686 * .35 = $240, equivalent to the amount of production calculated under AS 43.55.011(f) for the oil and other gas segment.
Then, finally for the gas used in the state segment for Property E the tax under AS 43.55.01 l(o) ($10) is less than the tax under AS 43.55.011(e) of $35. For the gas used in the state produced from Property G, the carried-forward annual loss of $150 ($150 gross value at the point of production minus $300 in allocated adjusted lease expenditures) is limited as determined under 15 AAC 55.224(f) as follows:
$150 in excess lease expenditures * tax rate 35% = $53 (15 AAC 55.224(f)(2))
Less $25 (sum of benefits as determined under 15 AAC 55.224(f)(4)) = $28 (15 AAC 55.224jf)(5) - 35% = $79 (15 AAC 55.224(f)(6)) $79 -5- $150 (excess lease expenditures from 15 AAC 55.224(f)(1)) = .53 (15 AAC 55.224(f)(7)) becomes the ratio applied to the carried-forward annual loss from 15 AAC 55.224(f)(1), so that:
$150 * .53 = $79, the amount of the carried-forward annual loss for Property G, gas used in the state.
A producer conducts a seismic survey, a type of active geophysical exploration, on the North Slope. The energy source is provided by a vehicle-mounted plate vibration generator (vibroseis). Vibrations for the purpose of the survey are generated at 1,000 locations over the course of the survey. The producer subsequently acquires an oil and gas lease that is within 25 miles of 345 of those locations, as measured from the nearest point in the lease. The other 655 locations are more than 25 miles from the lease. The lease expenditures incurred to conduct the seismic survey at the 345 locations within 25 miles of the lease are reasonably related to the lease. The amount of lease expenditures that are reasonably related to the lease may be calculated as 34.5 percent of the total lease expenditures incurred to conduct the seismic survey.
A unit composed of state oil and gas leases has been formed to encompass a specific potential hydrocarbon accumulation. A producer drills three wells to explore the potential hydrocarbon accumulation. The first well is a dry hole. The second well discovers a reservoir in the potential hydrocarbon accumulation. The third well penetrates the same reservoir. A participating area in which the producer owns an interest is established for the reservoir by the department of natural resources. The lease expenditures incurred to drill all three wells are reasonably related to the participating area, because all the wells were drilled to explore the potential hydrocarbon accumulation in question.
A producer produces oil from North Slope leases or properties for which the amount of tax calculated under AS 43.55.011(e)(2) for the calendar year is $150 after the deduction of adjusted lease expenditures under AS 43.55.165(a)(1) and (2). The minimum tax for the oil as determined under AS 43.55.011(f) for the calendar year is $100. Regardless of the amount of carried-forward annual losses under AS 43.55.165(a)(3) that the producer has available, carried-forward annual losses under AS 43.55.165(a)(3) may not be used to reduce the amount of tax calculated under AS 43.55.011(e) to less than $100. The producer deducts carried-forward annual losses under AS 43.55.165(a)(3) from a prior year to reduce the producer's tax liability to an amount equal to the amount of tax determined under AS 43.55.011(f) ($100) The producer has available $75 of credits earned in the current year under AS 43.55.024(i) and a tax credit under AS 43.55.023(b), as the provisions of that subsection read before January 1, 2018, for oil and gas produced before January 1, 2018, in the amount of $50. The entire amount of the tax credit under AS 43.55.024(i) of $75 may be applied to reduce the producer's tax liability to $25, and $25 dollars of the tax credit under AS 43.55.023(b) may be applied to further reduce the producer's tax liability down to zero. The remaining $25 of the tax credit under AS 43.55.023(b) may not be used to apply for a refund, but may be carried-forward to be used in a future period.
15 AAC 55.217
Authority:AS 43.05.080
AS 43.55.011
AS 43.55.110
AS 43.55.160
AS 43.55.165
Sec. 35, ch.3 SSSLA 2017