Court of Appeals of Oregon October 2002 casesIn the Matter of the Compensation of TalleyIn the Matter, the Compensation of SosnoskiWeber v. Oakridge S.D. 76Kneeland v. LampertCases Affirmed From the BenchBoothby v. D.R. Johnson Lumber Co.Moran v. WeldonKniss v. Public Employees Ret. Bd.Gildroy v. Bd. of Tax Service ExaminersMonogios and Co. v. City of PendletonState v. RamseyState v. StephensChamberlain v. City of PortlandWestern Eq. v. St. Paul F, Mar. Ins. CBrown v. PalmateerState v. McCormickTakano v. Farmers Ins. Co. of OregonIn the Matter of Machuca-RamirezGodin v. HillState v. McCloudMcFarlane v. Pony Express Courier Corp.State v. JimIn the Matter, the Guardianship of WildeState v. WigginsState v. NasonOutdoor Media Dimensions, Inc. v. Driver & Motor Vehicle Services BranchState v. SmithTowry v. KiserCases Affirmed Without OpinionIn the Matter of the Marriage of WeberCity of Nyssa v. DuflothIn the Matter of the Estate of BartelsState v. LytsellState v. CutriState v. WoodenState v. HowettIn the Matter of the Marriage of RubeyState v. GlaspeyState v. NguyenIn the Matter of the Marriage of WilsonIn the Matter of the Marriage of MoserState v. JonesDay v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionState v. MeredithIn the Matter, O'Donnell-Lamont (Deceased)State v. KinkelState v. McMillanStone v. FinnertyBogle v. ArmenakisIn the Matter of the Compensation of BauerOutdoor Media Dimensions, Inc. v. Driver & Motor Vehicle Services BranchState v. EhretDay v. Advanced M&D Sales, Inc.Cases Affirmed Without OpinionArlington S.D. No. 3 v. Arlington Ed. AssnIn the Matter of the Marriage of McDuffyTandem Properties, LLC v. Construction Contractors BoardIn the Matter of RainboltState v. ShieldsHale v. Water Res. Dept. of the StateTeague v. PalmateerBrennan v. La Tourelle ApartmentsState v. TorresState v. EhretIn the Matter of the Marriage of NiblerEntrada Lodge v. Bureau, Labor and IndusState v. CunninghamIn the Matter of MaddocksCases Affirmed Without OpinionCases Affirmed Without OpinionKerley v. Real Estate AgencyIn the Matter of the Compensation of RickerState v. Torre
