Court of Appeals of Indiana August 1992 casesO'Campo v. O'CampoKleine-Albrandt v. LambDillon v. GloverChaiken v. Eldon Emmor Co., Inc.Tofany v. NBS Imaging Systems, Inc.Spier by Spier v. City of PlymouthMatter of A.C.BPedrick v. StateCNA Insurance Companies (CNA) v. VellucciWal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. BlaylockIn re Marriage of BrownMalooley v. McIntyreGardner v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co.Weatherford v. StateBecker v. PlemmonsJackson v. StateFinch v. FinchBrunner v. Economy Preferred Ins. Co.Matter of Guardianship of RileyDriver v. StateSmith v. StateBreeck v. City of MadisonNorth American Roofing v. Westmont SteelCap Gemini America, Inc. v. JuddNorthern Indiana Public Service Co. v. SellAmax Coal Co. v. AdamsKutche Chevrolet v. Anderson BankingSierp v. VogelHughes v. BrooksSt. Anthony Medical Center v. SmithAtteberry v. AtteberryNelson v. DenkinsAllstate Ins. Co. v. KepcharTudder v. TorresIndiana DLandowner's request for floodway construction permit was denied by the Natural Resources Commission (NRC), and landowner sought judicial review. The Marion Superior Court, James S. Kirsch, J., vacated NRC's order. NRC appealed. The Court of Appeals, Ratliff, C.J., held that: (1) landowner had burden of proving that no harm would come to fish, wildlife or botanical resources through its proposed construction; (2) property was "floodway" within meaning of Indiana Flood Control Act; and (8) landowner was not denied fundamental due process.epartment of Natural Resources v. United Refuse Co.Wendt v. KerkhofCavazzi v. CavazziState Bd. of Public Welfare v. Tioga PinesIndiana Dept. of Public Welfare v. PayneBojrab v. John Carr AgencyHatcher v. BarnesMcBride v. StateCrosby v. StateMechanics Laundry Supply v. Wilder OilAlexander v. StateLutheran Hosp. of Ind. v. Public Welfare
