From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ziotas v. the Reardon Law Firm

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jan 7, 2009
290 Conn. 903 (Conn. 2009)

Opinion

Decided January 7, 2009


The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 111 Conn. App. 287 (AC 28260), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court improperly conclude that the Connecticut wage statute, General Statutes § 31-71a, applied to the plaintiff's year-end bonus?"

KATZ, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18292.

William F. Gallagher, in support of the petition.

Anthony M. Fitzgerald and David S. Hardy, in opposition.


Summaries of

Ziotas v. the Reardon Law Firm

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jan 7, 2009
290 Conn. 903 (Conn. 2009)
Case details for

Ziotas v. the Reardon Law Firm

Case Details

Full title:ANGELO A. ZIOTAS v. THE REARDON LAW FIRM, P.C

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Jan 7, 2009

Citations

290 Conn. 903 (Conn. 2009)
962 A.2d 796

Citing Cases

Ziotas v. Reardon Law Firm, P.C

We granted the defendant's petition for certification to appeal, limited to the following issue: "Did the…

Comm. of Lab. v. FIRE.'S Fund Ins.

In that case, the salesperson's bonus is a "wage" because the employer has no contractual discretion to deny…