From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zielesch v. Lewis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 31, 2012
No. 2:11-CV-2242-MCE-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:11-CV-2242-MCE-CMK-P

08-31-2012

GREGORY ZIELESCH, Petitioner, v. G.D. LEWIS, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

Petitioner seeks the appointment of counsel (Doc. 16). There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed. R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not at this time find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel. Further requests for the appointment of counsel will not be considered unless the court grants an evidentiary hearing, in which case petitioner may re-apply for the appointment of counsel.

Petitioner also seeks an order granting an evidentiary hearing. That request will be discussed in separate findings and recommendations.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. 16) is denied.

_______________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Zielesch v. Lewis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 31, 2012
No. 2:11-CV-2242-MCE-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2012)
Case details for

Zielesch v. Lewis

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY ZIELESCH, Petitioner, v. G.D. LEWIS, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 31, 2012

Citations

No. 2:11-CV-2242-MCE-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2012)