From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zambuto v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 17, 1999
731 So. 2d 46 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Summary

finding that a ruling on a motion to recuse is not dispositive and citing Duckworth v. State , 469 So. 2d 913 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), as holding the same

Summary of this case from Blalock v. State

Opinion

No. 98-0179

Opinion filed March 17, 1999 JANUARY TERM 1999

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; John L. Phillips, Judge; L.T. No. 97-9874 CFA02.

Charles W. Musgrove, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Sarah B. Mayer, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Following his plea of guilty to attempting to obtain a controlled substance by fraud, Francesco Zambuto, the appellant, seeks to appeal the trial court's denial of his pre-trial motions seeking removal of his public defender and recusal of the trial judge. Despite Zambuto's attempts during the plea colloquy to reserve his right to appeal the rulings on these motions and the trial judge's statement to Zambuto that he "believe[d]" that Zambuto could reserve the right to appeal, we must dismiss this appeal.

Following a plea of guilty or nolo contendere, a defendant may "expressly reserve the right to appeal a priordispositive order of the lower tribunal. . . ." Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A) (emphasis added); see also §§ 924.051(4), 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (1997). An issue is legally dispositive "only if, regardless of whether the appellate court affirms or reverses the lower court's decision, there will be no trial of the case." Vaughn v. State, 711 So.2d 64, 65 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 722 So.2d 195 (Fla. 1998). Neither of the rulings that Zambuto seeks to appeal is dispositive. See Duckworth v. State, 469 So.2d 913 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985) (holding that ruling on motion for recusal not dispositive). Accordingly, we dismiss the instant appeal. Such dismissal, however, is without prejudice to Zambuto's right to file a motion in the lower court seeking to withdraw his plea. See Carlisle v. State, 687 So.2d 929 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).

DELL, STEVENSON and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Zambuto v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 17, 1999
731 So. 2d 46 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

finding that a ruling on a motion to recuse is not dispositive and citing Duckworth v. State , 469 So. 2d 913 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), as holding the same

Summary of this case from Blalock v. State
Case details for

Zambuto v. State

Case Details

Full title:FRANCESCO ZAMBUTO, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Mar 17, 1999

Citations

731 So. 2d 46 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

Levine v. State

An issue is preserved for appeal on a guilty plea only if it is dispositive of the case. See Fla.R.App.P.…

Levine v. State

An issue is preserved for appeal on a guilty plea only if it is dispositive of the case. See Zambuto v.…