From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zachry v. Hobbs

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS
Sep 26, 2013
2013 Ark. 351 (Ark. 2013)

Opinion

No. CV-11-486

2013-09-26

CAROLYN DIANNE ZACHRY APPELLANT v. RAY HOBBS, DIRECTOR, ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION APPELLEE

J. Brooks Wiggins, for appellant. Dustin McDaniel, Att'y Gen., by: Ashley Argo Priest, Ass't Att'y Gen., for appellee.


APPEAL FROM THE JACKSON

COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, 34CV-09-

99, HON. HAROLD S. ERWIN, JUDGE


APPEAL DISMISSED.


PER CURIAM

On May 11, 2009, appellant Carolyn Dianne Zachry filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus in the Jackson County Circuit Court. In her petition, appellant states that she is an inmate incarcerated in the Arkansas Department of Correction (ADC) at a facility in Jackson County. The circuit court denied the petition, and appellant lodged this appeal.

We dismiss the appeal because the Jackson County Circuit Court can no longer grant the relief requested by appellant. An appeal from an order that denied a petition for postconviction relief, including a petition for writ of habeas corpus, will not be permitted to go forward where it is clear that the appellant could not prevail. Wilencewicz v. Hobbs, 2012 Ark. 230 (per curiam); Fudge v. Hobbs, 2012 Ark. 80 (per curiam).

Any petition for writ of habeas corpus to effect the release of a prisoner is properly addressed to the circuit court in the county in which the prisoner is held in custody, unless the petition is filed pursuant to Act 1780 of 2001. Wilencewicz, 2012 Ark. 230; Davis v. Hobbs, 2012 Ark. 167 (per curiam). Appellant's petition was not filed under Act 1780, and the public records of the ADC confirm that appellant is now incarcerated in a facility in Pulaski County.

A circuit court does not have jurisdiction to release on a writ of habeas corpus a prisoner not in custody in that court's jurisdiction. Chestang v. Hobbs, 2011 Ark. 404 (per curiam); Buckhanna v. Hobbs, 2011 Ark. 119 (per curiam). When a prisoner who seeks habeas relief is transferred to a facility in a different county, the circuit court in the county where the prisoner was previously incarcerated no longer has jurisdiction to issue and make a returnable writ. Wilencewicz, 2012 Ark. 230. Although the Jackson County Circuit Court may have retained subject-matter jurisdiction, it does not retain personal jurisdiction over the person in whose custody the prisoner is detained, and an order by that court will not act to effect her release. Id. This court will dismiss an appeal of the denial of a petition for writ of habeas corpus where the appellant is no longer incarcerated in the county where her petition was filed because the court can no longer grant the relief sought. Id.

Appeal dismissed.

J. Brooks Wiggins, for appellant.

Dustin McDaniel, Att'y Gen., by: Ashley Argo Priest, Ass't Att'y Gen., for appellee.


Summaries of

Zachry v. Hobbs

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS
Sep 26, 2013
2013 Ark. 351 (Ark. 2013)
Case details for

Zachry v. Hobbs

Case Details

Full title:CAROLYN DIANNE ZACHRY APPELLANT v. RAY HOBBS, DIRECTOR, ARKANSAS…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

Date published: Sep 26, 2013

Citations

2013 Ark. 351 (Ark. 2013)

Citing Cases

Meadows v. State

As it is clear from the record that appellant could not prevail on appeal, the appeal is dismissed. The…