From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chestang v. Hobbs

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS
Sep 29, 2011
2011 Ark. 404 (Ark. 2011)

Opinion

No. 11-629

09-29-2011

KE'ONDRA MONTREL CHESTANG APPELLANT v. RAY HOBBS APPELLEE


PRO SE MOTIONS FOR RULE ON

CLERK AND FOR EXTENSION OF

TIME TO FILE BRIEF [LINCOLN

COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, LCV 2011

07, HON. JODI RAINES DENNIS

JUDGE]

APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTIONS MOOT.


On January 25, 2011, appellant Ke'ondra Montrel Chestang, an inmate incarcerated in the Arkansas Department of Correction (ADC) at a facility in Lincoln County, filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus in the Lincoln County Circuit Court. The court denied the petition, and appellant lodged an appeal from the order in this court.

On July 28, 2011, appellant filed the motions that are now before us, seeking an order directing the circuit clerk in Lincoln County to provide him with certain documents for the addendum to his brief and an extension of time in which to file the brief. His address on the motions reflected that he had been transferred to an ADC facility located in Jefferson County.

We do not reach the merits of the motions and dismiss the appeal because the Lincoln County Circuit Court can no longer grant the relief requested by appellant. Waller v. Norris, 2011 Ark. 168 (per curiam); Buckhanna v. Hobbs, 2011 Ark. 119 (per curiam). An appeal of the denial of postconviction relief, including an appeal from an order that denied a petition for writ of habeas corpus, will not be permitted to go forward where it is clear that the appellant could not prevail. Waller, 2011 Ark. 168; Buckhanna, 2011 Ark. 119; Davis v. State, 2011 Ark. 6 (per curiam); Lukach v. State, 369 Ark. 475, 255 S.W.3d 832 (2007) (per curiam).

Any petition for writ of habeas corpus to effect the release of a prisoner is properly addressed to the circuit court in the county in which the prisoner is held in custody. By the time appellant filed the instant motions, he was in custody in Jefferson County, where he is currently incarcerated. The records of the Department of Correction verify the change in location.

There is an exception for petitioners claiming the right to be released on a writ of habeas corpus on the ground of actual innocence under Act 1780 of 2001, codified at Arkansas Code Annotated sections 16-112-201 to -208 (Repl. 2006). Pursuant to Arkansas Code Annotated section 16-112-201(a), such petitions are filed in the court where the judgment of conviction was entered. Appellant is incarcerated by virtue of judgments of conviction entered in the Columbia County Circuit Court and the Lee County Circuit Court.

A circuit court does not have jurisdiction to release on a writ of habeas corpus a prisoner not in custody in that court's jurisdiction. Waller, 2011 Ark. 168; Buckhanna, 2011 Ark. 119; Hill v. State, 2010 Ark. 102 (per curiam); Pardue v. State, 338 Ark. 606, 999 S.W.2d 198 (1999) (per curiam) (citing Mackey v. Lockhart, 307 Ark. 321, 819 S.W.2d 702 (1991)). Even if appellant's petition had merit, and the circuit court erred in dismissing it, appellant cannot now prevail on appeal. Waller, 2011 Ark. 168; Buckhanna, 2011 Ark. 119. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed, and the motions are moot.

Appeal dismissed; motions moot.


Summaries of

Chestang v. Hobbs

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS
Sep 29, 2011
2011 Ark. 404 (Ark. 2011)
Case details for

Chestang v. Hobbs

Case Details

Full title:KE'ONDRA MONTREL CHESTANG APPELLANT v. RAY HOBBS APPELLEE

Court:SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

Date published: Sep 29, 2011

Citations

2011 Ark. 404 (Ark. 2011)

Citing Cases

Lukach v. Hobbs

We do not reach the merits of the motions and dismiss the appeal because the Jefferson County Circuit Court…

Cromeans v. Hobbs

The intent of the motions is not clear, but, in any event, we need not reach the merits of them as the…