From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zachman v. Kiffmeyer

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Jul 12, 2001
629 N.W.2d 98 (Minn. 2001)

Summary

adopting as its template the plan used by the Hippert court

Summary of this case from Johnson v. Wis. Elections Comm'n

Opinion

No. C0-01-160.

Dated: July 12, 2001


ORDER

On March 2, 2001, petitioners' motion for the appointment of a special redistricting panel to hear and decide challenges to the validity of state legislative and congressional districts based on the 2000 Census was granted. The appointment of the panel was stayed until further order of the Chief Justice. Upon review of the duties and responsibilities to be undertaken by the panel, it is now determined that the appointment of a five-judge panel is necessary and appropriate. The concern remains, however:

While the need to have state legislative and congressional district lines drawn in time for the 2002 election cycle imposes undeniable time constraints on this process, it is important that the primacy of the legislative role in the redistricting process be honored and that the judiciary not be drawn prematurely into that process.

Order of Chief Justice, No. C0-01-160 (Mar. 2, 2001).

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following judges are appointed to hear and decide all matters, including all pretrial and trial motions, in connection with the panel's ultimate disposition of the above-entitled action:

Hon. Edward Toussaint, Jr., presiding judge

Hon. Thomas J. Kalitowski

Hon. Gary J. Pagliaccetti

Hon. Heidi S. Schellhas

Hon. Renee L. Worke

See Minn. Stat. § 2.724, subd. 1 (2000).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the special redistricting panel shall release a redistricting plan that satisfies constitutional and statutory requirements only in the event a legislative redistricting plan is not enacted in a timely manner. See White v. Weiser, 412 U.S. 783, 794-95 (1973) ("[R]eapportionment is primarily a matter for legislative consideration and determination * * *."); Minn. Stat. § 204B.14, subd. 3(c) (2000) (requiring precinct boundaries to be reestablished within 60 days of redistricting, or at least 19 weeks before state primary election, whichever occurs first).

BY THE CHIEF JUSTICE: _________________________________ Kathleen A. Blatz Chief Justice


Summaries of

Zachman v. Kiffmeyer

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Jul 12, 2001
629 N.W.2d 98 (Minn. 2001)

adopting as its template the plan used by the Hippert court

Summary of this case from Johnson v. Wis. Elections Comm'n

appointing five-judge panel to hear and decide challenges to the validity of state legislative and congressional districts based on the 2000 Census

Summary of this case from Kahn v. Griffin
Case details for

Zachman v. Kiffmeyer

Case Details

Full title:Susan M. Zachman, Maryland Lucky R. Rosenbloom, Victor L.M. Gomez, Gregory…

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Jul 12, 2001

Citations

629 N.W.2d 98 (Minn. 2001)

Citing Cases

Kahn v. Griffin

On March 19, 2002, the Minnesota Special Redistricting Panel issued its final order adopting a legislative…

Kahn v. Griffin

On March 19, 2002, the Minnesota Special Redistricting Panel adopted its final legislative redistricting…