From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. Lamas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 23, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-3623 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 23, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-3623

04-23-2013

CHRISTOPHER YOUNG v. SUPERINTENDENT LAMAS, et al.


ORDER

AND NOW, this 23rd day of April, 2013, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Commonwealth's response, inclusive of all exhibits thereto, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of the Chief United States Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED;
2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED without an evidentiary hearing; and
3. Petitioner has not met statutory requirements to have his case heard and no reasonable jurist could find this procedural ruling debatable; thus, a certificate of appealability is DENIED.

I note that no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed.

BY THE COURT:

______________________________

LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.


Summaries of

Young v. Lamas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 23, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-3623 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 23, 2013)
Case details for

Young v. Lamas

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER YOUNG v. SUPERINTENDENT LAMAS, et al.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Apr 23, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-3623 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 23, 2013)

Citing Cases

Box v. Petsock

Furthermore, "the Court in Martinez was clear that it was not creating a new constitutional rule." Printup v.…