From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Xavier v. French

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Dec 11, 2013
2:09-cv-0783 LKK CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2013)

Opinion


GARY R. XAVIER, Plaintiff, v. M. FRENCH, et al., Defendants. No. 2:09-cv-0783 LKK CKD P United States District Court, E.D. California. December 11, 2013

          ORDER

          LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, Senior District Judge.

         On September 30, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued an order denying plaintiff's motion substitution of counsel. On November 22, 2013, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of that order. Local Rule 303(b), states "rulings by Magistrate Judges... shall be final if no reconsideration thereof is sought from the Court within fourteen days... from the date of service of the ruling on the parties." Id . Plaintiff's request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order of September 30, 2013 is therefore untimely.

Plaintiff's request is dated November 22, 2013, which is deemed the filing date of the document. See Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988). The request was entered on the docket in this action on December 2, 2013.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's request for reconsideration (ECF No. 61) is denied.


Summaries of

Xavier v. French

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Dec 11, 2013
2:09-cv-0783 LKK CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Xavier v. French

Case Details

Full title:GARY R. XAVIER, Plaintiff, v. M. FRENCH, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 11, 2013

Citations

2:09-cv-0783 LKK CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2013)