From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. Turner

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Feb 11, 2019
Case No. 3:19-cv-39 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 11, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 3:19-cv-39

02-11-2019

BRUCE D. WRIGHT, Plaintiff, v. ZACHARY T. TURNER, USAF Assistant Staff Judge Advocate, Defendant.


District Judge Walter H. Rice
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Attached is a NOTICE to the parties regarding objections to this Report and Recommendation. --------

Plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis and affidavit in support thereof pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) in connection with this civil suit. (Doc. #1). His affidavit reveals that in the past twelve months, he has received $22,152 in retirement pay, $30,000 in stock dividends, $9,600 from his 401K retirement account, and $1,000 as a volleyball referee. He is not employed. He also indicates that he has $30,000 in a checking, saving, and/or other account. He owns a home valued at $350,000 and a cabin valued at $150,000. He has $400,000 in stocks and $500,000 in his 401K account. He owes one creditor, Capital One, $10,000.

Plaintiff's affidavit does not demonstrate that his income and assets are insufficient to provide himself with the necessities of life and still have sufficient funds to pay the full filing fee of $400.00 in order to institute this action. See Adkins v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co., Inc., 335 U.S. 331, 339 (1948).

IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT:

Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #1) be DENIED.

February 11, 2019

s/Sharon L . Ovington

Sharon L. Ovington

United States Magistrate Judge

NOTICE REGARDING OBJECTIONS

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), any party may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations within FOURTEEN days after being served with this Report and Recommendation. Such objections shall specify the portions of the Report objected to and shall be accompanied by a memorandum of law in support of the objections. If the Report and Recommendation is based in whole or in part upon matters occurring of record at an oral hearing, the objecting party shall promptly arrange for the transcription of the record, or such portions of it as all parties may agree upon or the Magistrate Judge deems sufficient, unless the assigned District Judge otherwise directs. A party may respond to another party's objections within FOURTEEN days after being served with a copy thereof.

Failure to make objections in accordance with this procedure may forfeit rights on appeal. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981).


Summaries of

Wright v. Turner

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Feb 11, 2019
Case No. 3:19-cv-39 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 11, 2019)
Case details for

Wright v. Turner

Case Details

Full title:BRUCE D. WRIGHT, Plaintiff, v. ZACHARY T. TURNER, USAF Assistant Staff…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Feb 11, 2019

Citations

Case No. 3:19-cv-39 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 11, 2019)