From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
May 15, 2019
No. 76104-COA (Nev. App. May. 15, 2019)

Opinion

No. 76104-COA

05-15-2019

ARRION DANTE WRIGHT, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

Arrion Dante Wright appeals from a district court order denying a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed on March 7, 2018. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Michael Villani, Judge.

This appeal has been submitted for decision without oral argument. NRAP 34(f)(3).

Wright's petition was untimely because it was filed more than five years after the judgment of conviction was entered on February 12, 2013. See NRS 34.726(1). Consequently, Wright's petition was procedurally barred absent a demonstration of good cause and actual prejudice or that the failure to consider his claim would result in a fundamental miscarriage of justice. See NRS 34.726(1); NRS 34.810(3); Pellegrini v. State, 117 Nev. 860, 887, 34 P.3d 519, 537 (2001).

Wright did not pursue a direct appeal.

The district court found that Wright's attempts to show good cause by asserting an ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim and hinting at an actual innocence claim constituted bare allegations that were not sufficient to overcome the mandatory procedural bars. The district court's finding is supported by the record on appeal, and we conclude the district court did not err by denying Wright's procedurally-barred habeas petition, motion for appointment of counsel, and request for an evidentiary hearing. See NRS 34.750(1); NRS 34.770(2); Renteria-Novoa v. State, 133 Nev. 75, 76, 391 P.3d 760, 760-61 (2017); State v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court (Riker), 121 Nev. 225, 231, 112 P.3d 1070, 1074 (2005); Hargrove v. State, 100 Nev. 498, 502-03, 686 P.2d 222, 225 (1984). Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

We note, because Wright's judgment of conviction was entered pursuant to a guilty plea and his deadly-weapon-enhancement claim did not allege ineffective assistance of counsel or challenge the validity of the guilty plea, the claim was not properly raised in the postconviction petition. See NRS 34.810(1)(a). --------

/s/_________, C.J.

Gibbons

/s/_________, J.

Tao

/s/_________, J.

Bulla cc: Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge

Arrion Dante Wright

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Wright v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
May 15, 2019
No. 76104-COA (Nev. App. May. 15, 2019)
Case details for

Wright v. State

Case Details

Full title:ARRION DANTE WRIGHT, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: May 15, 2019

Citations

No. 76104-COA (Nev. App. May. 15, 2019)