From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woodman v. Dep't of Corr.

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Apr 22, 2022
972 N.W.2d 246 (Mich. 2022)

Opinion

SC: 163382 COA: 353164 SC: 163383 COA: 353165

04-22-2022

Spencer WOODMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellee. George Joseph, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Department of Corrections, Defendant-Appellee.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 24, 2021 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on the application. MCR 7.305(H)(1).

The appellants shall file a supplemental brief within 42 days of the date of this order addressing whether: (1) they prevailed in full, and are thus statutorily entitled to attorney fees under MCL 15.240(6) ; (2) the Court of Claims abused its discretion when it reduced by 90% the attorneys’ fees awarded to the appellants based solely on the pro bono nature of Honigman LLP's representation, notwithstanding the Court of Claims’ factual findings that Honigman's hourly rates and the number of hours worked were reasonable; and (3) the Court of Claims clearly erred in denying the appellants punitive damages under MCL 15.240(7). In the brief, citations to the record must provide the appendix page numbers as required by MCR 7.312(B)(1). The appellee shall file a supplemental brief within 21 days of being served with the appellants’ brief. A reply, if any, must be filed by the appellants within 14 days of being served with the appellee's brief. The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.


Summaries of

Woodman v. Dep't of Corr.

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Apr 22, 2022
972 N.W.2d 246 (Mich. 2022)
Case details for

Woodman v. Dep't of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:Spencer WOODMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Apr 22, 2022

Citations

972 N.W.2d 246 (Mich. 2022)

Citing Cases

Woodman v. Dep't of Corrs.

Plaintiffs sought leave to appeal in this Court. We ordered oral argument on the application and asked the…