From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wonder Works Const. Corp. v. Rcdolner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 23, 2007
44 A.D.3d 526 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

October 23, 2007.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Debra A. James, J.), entered April 13, 2007, which granted defendant's motion to vacate a default judgment entered March 9, 2007, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Lippman, P.J., Andrias, Williams, Buckley and Malone, JJ.


Defendant carried its burden of proving it had not received notice of the summons in time to defend the action and had a potentially meritorious defense (CPLR 317; see Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v AC. Button Lbr. Co., 67 NY2d 138; Franklin v 172 Aububon Corp., 32 AD3d 454). Plaintiff did not serve the additional notice required by CPLR 3215 (g) (4) (i), and there is no evidence that defendant, who moved swiftly to vacate its default upon learning of the judgment, deliberately attempted to avoid notice of this action ( see Grosso v MTO Assoc. Ltd. Partnership, 12 AD3d 402).


Summaries of

Wonder Works Const. Corp. v. Rcdolner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 23, 2007
44 A.D.3d 526 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Wonder Works Const. Corp. v. Rcdolner

Case Details

Full title:WONDER WORKS CONSTRUCTION CORP., Appellant v. RCDOLNER, LLC, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 23, 2007

Citations

44 A.D.3d 526 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
843 N.Y.S.2d 504

Citing Cases

Sanchez v. Frederic Fekkai (Mark NY) LLC

Plaintiff's counsel affirms that he personally mailed a copy of the summons to defendant at 25 East 77th…

Delijani v. Law Office of Sean Sabeti, P.C.

The defendant's submissions also adequately alleged facts sufficient to demonstrate potentially meritorious…