From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wolfe v. Alameida

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 5, 2009
No. CIV S-03-2574 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-03-2574 LKK GGH P.

October 5, 2009


ORDER


Plaintiff, now a former state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 20, 2009, defendants' filed a motion to dismiss (Doc. 100) as a sanction for plaintiff's failure to appear at two depositions. Plaintiff has not filed an opposition.

Plaintiff indicates he is now a parolee and his address of record substantiates that he is no longer incarcerated.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff shall file an opposition to the motion to dismiss (Doc. 100) within twenty-one (21) days of service of this order.

2. Failure to file an opposition may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.


Summaries of

Wolfe v. Alameida

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 5, 2009
No. CIV S-03-2574 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2009)
Case details for

Wolfe v. Alameida

Case Details

Full title:MARION C. WOLFE, JR., Plaintiff, v. EDWARD S. ALAMEIDA, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 5, 2009

Citations

No. CIV S-03-2574 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2009)