From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wisoff v. County of Westchester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 2002
296 A.D.2d 402 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Summary

finding no liability to District for providing transportation for its students on public buses

Summary of this case from Cominsky v. City of Syracuse

Opinion

2001-01288

Argued May 7, 2002

July 1, 2002.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Bellantoni, J.), dated January 3, 2001, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendants County of Westchester and Corali Edwards which was for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs' claims against them based upon violations of Vehicle and Traffic Law §§ 375(20) and 1174(b), and granted that branch of the motion of the defendant third-party defendant, Board of Education of the City of New Rochelle, which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ecker, Loehr, Ecker Ecker, LLP, Yonkers, N.Y. (Ruth F-L. Post and Gerald E. Loehr of counsel), for appellants.

Nesci, Keane, Piekarski, Keogh Corrigan (Melito Adolfsen, PC [Ignatius John Melito and Paul F. McAloon of counsel), for defendant third-party plaintiff-respondent and defendant-respondent.

O'Connor, McGuinness, Conte, Doyle Oleson, White Plains, N.Y. (Montgomery L. Effinger of counsel), for defendant third-party defendant-respondent.

NANCY E. SMITH, J.P., CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, HOWARD MILLER, BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs payable to the defendants appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The infant plaintiff was injured when she was struck by a vehicle driven by the defendant Nancy Ricevuto shortly after alighting from a bus operated by the defendant Corali Edwards. The plaintiffs premise their theory of liability upon alleged violations of the Vehicle and Traffic Law, because the bus in which the infant plaintiff was transported was not equipped as a "school bus."

The Supreme Court correctly concluded that Edwards and the County of Westchester are not subject to liability for failure to comply with Vehicle and Traffic Law §§ 375(20) and 1174(b). The bus from which the infant plaintiff alighted was not being used "exclusively" to transport pupils (see Vehicle and Traffic Law § 375). In addition, Edwards' duty to the infant plaintiff as a passenger terminated when the infant plaintiff alighted safely onto the sidewalk (see Sigmond v. Liberty Lines Tr., 261 A.D.2d 385; Shahzaman v. Green Bus Lines Co., 214 A.D.2d 722; Kramer v. Lagnese, 144 A.D.2d 648).

The Supreme Court also correctly granted summary judgment to the Board of Education of the City of New Rochelle. Where a school district has engaged an independent contractor to provide bus transportation, the school district cannot be held liable based on physical custody once the children board the contractor's bus (see Sigmond v. Liberty Lines Tr., supra at 387; see also Chainani v. Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., 87 N.Y.2d 370; Womak v. Duvernay, 229 A.D.2d 488).

SMITH, J.P., O'BRIEN, H. MILLER and COZIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wisoff v. County of Westchester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 2002
296 A.D.2d 402 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

finding no liability to District for providing transportation for its students on public buses

Summary of this case from Cominsky v. City of Syracuse
Case details for

Wisoff v. County of Westchester

Case Details

Full title:ALYSSA WISOFF, ETC., et al., appellants, v. COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 1, 2002

Citations

296 A.D.2d 402 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
745 N.Y.S.2d 60

Citing Cases

Virgil Smith v. Sherwood

Contrary to plaintiffs contention, however, the court properly granted those parts of the motion of the…

Smith v. Sherwood

Mackenzie Hughes LLP, Syracuse ( W. Bradley Hunt and Stephen T. Helmer of counsel), for appellants. I.…