From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Winters v. Gray Line Sight Seeing Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Jun 1, 1942
315 Ill. App. 132 (Ill. App. Ct. 1942)

Opinion

Gen. No. 42,015. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed June 1, 1942

NEW TRIAL, § 47amount of verdict as indicating passion and prejudice. In an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained when a bus in which plaintiff was riding collided with a car and plaintiff was thrown forward, her neck striking the seat in front of her, the theory of the complaint was that plaintiff received a physical injury which brought about a mental psychosis, and plaintiff did not testify, whatever the cause, a verdict of $20,000 damages disclosed passion and prejudice and compelled a new trial.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from Circuit Court of Cook county; Hon. LOYD M. BRADLEY, presiding.

Reversed and remanded. Heard in first division, first district, this court at February term, 1942.

Miller, Gorham, Wescott Adams, for appellants;

Edward R. Adams and Herbert C. DeYoung, of counsel;

Helman, Reilly Silverman and Marion J. Hannigan, for appellee.


"Not to be published in full." Opinion filed June 1, 1942.


Summaries of

Winters v. Gray Line Sight Seeing Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Jun 1, 1942
315 Ill. App. 132 (Ill. App. Ct. 1942)
Case details for

Winters v. Gray Line Sight Seeing Co.

Case Details

Full title:Elizabeth Winters, Appellee, v. Gray Line Sight Seeing Company of Chicago…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, First District

Date published: Jun 1, 1942

Citations

315 Ill. App. 132 (Ill. App. Ct. 1942)
42 N.E.2d 125