From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Winn v. Hermani Mgmt.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 17, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-4240 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 17, 2019)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-4240

12-17-2019

LINDA WINN v. HERMANI MANAGEMENT, LLC doing business as WYNDHAM PHILADELPHIA - BUCKS COUNTY, ET AL.


MEMORANDUM McHUGH, J

This is an employment action brought under both title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Americans with Disabilities Act. A default judgment was entered against the defendants, followed by a trial on damages after which an award was entered in favor of Plaintiff Linda Winn. Plaintiff now moves for an award of counsel fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1988 (b).

A prevailing party should "ordinarily recover an attorney's fee unless special circumstances would render such an award unjust." Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises Inc. 390 U.S. 400 (1968). Fees should be awarded according to the "prevailing market rate in the relevant community." Blum v. Stenson, 465 U.S. 886 (1984). Counsel has filed a detailed and well -documented petition, to which there has been no response. Having independently reviewed the petition and its attachments, including affidavits as to the appropriate market rate, I conclude that the petition should be granted in its entirety.

Specifically, I conclude that a reasonable hourly rate for Ari Karpf, Esquire is $450, and for David Korsen, Esquire, $260. I further conclude that the total number of hours spent by counsel was reasonable, and that it is appropriate to include in the fee award counsel's participation in proceedings before the EEOC, and the time counsel spent in preparing the fee petition. In that regard, I commend counsel for not seeking compensation for time spent by paralegal assistants, notwithstanding the recoverability of such expenses under controlling case law.

Accordingly, the judgment entered in favor of Plaintiff will be amended to add $11,231.81 in reasonable attorneys' fees and costs as reflected in the attached order.

/s/ Gerald Austin McHugh

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Winn v. Hermani Mgmt.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 17, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-4240 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 17, 2019)
Case details for

Winn v. Hermani Mgmt.

Case Details

Full title:LINDA WINN v. HERMANI MANAGEMENT, LLC doing business as WYNDHAM…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Dec 17, 2019

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-4240 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 17, 2019)

Citing Cases

Nitkin v. Main Line Health

Ms. Nitkin offers the Burke affidavit to rebut MLH's position that $480 is a reasonable rate for Mr. Koller…

Holmes v. Am. HomePatient

Otherwise, for example, there would be no reason for courts to independently review fee petitions in default…