Winn v. Hermani Mgmt.

2 Citing cases

  1. Holmes v. Am. HomePatient

    4:21-CV-01683 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 28, 2025)

    Otherwise, for example, there would be no reason for courts to independently review fee petitions in default judgment cases.E.g., Winn v. Hermani Mgmt., LLC, Civ. A. No. 18-4240, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 216248 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 17, 2019) (“Counsel has filed a detailed and well-documented petition, to which there has been no response.

  2. Nitkin v. Main Line Health

    Civil Action 20-4825-KSM (E.D. Pa. Jul. 7, 2022)

    Ms. Nitkin offers the Burke affidavit to rebut MLH's position that $480 is a reasonable rate for Mr. Koller because Ari Karpf, the founder of Karpf, Karpf & Cerutti, was awarded an hourly rate of $450 in Winn v. Hermani Management, Civil Action No. 18-4240, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 216248 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 17, 2019). (See generally Burke Aff.; Doc. No. 84; Doc. No. 81 at 5.)