From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Willing v. Purtill

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Jan 31, 2008
Civ. No. 07-1618-AA (D. Or. Jan. 31, 2008)

Summary

reducing fee award by 15% due to respondent's financial circumstances, particularly his unemployment

Summary of this case from Kim v. Ferdinand

Opinion

Civ. No. 07-1618-AA.

January 31, 2008


ORDER


Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54, petitioner moves for an award of attorney fees and costs. Respondent is unrepresented in this action and has not filed any opposition to the motion. Petitioner's motion is granted in the amount of $28,669.65 for attorney fees, $10,052.30 for costs, for a total award of $38,721.95.

DISCUSSION

Petitioner brought this petition for return of her children to Australia under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, and its implementing legislation, the International Child Abduction Remedies Act (ICARA). 42 U.S.C. §§ 11601 et seq. After a one day bench trial, this court granted the petition and ordered the return of the children to their "habitual residence" (Australia).

Petitioner now moves for attorney fees and costs. The court notes that ICARA requires any court ordering the return of a child under the Hague Convention to award fees and costs to the successful party unless such order would be "clearly inappropriate." 42 U.S.C. § 11607(b)(3). The statute holds, in part:

(b) Costs incurred in civil actions
* * *
(3) Any court ordering the return of a child pursuant to an action brought under section 11603 of this title shall order the respondent to pay necessary expenses incurred by or on behalf of the petitioner, including court costs, legal fees, foster home or other care during the course of the proceedings in the action, and transportation costs related to the return of the child, unless the respondent establishes that such an order would be clearly inappropriate.
Id.

The purpose of this requirement is to restore the petitioner to the financial position she would have been in had there been no removal and to deter such conduct from happening in the first place. See Convention Text and Legal Analysis, 51 Fed.Reg. 10494, 10511 (Mar. 26, 1986).

Petitioner incurred a total of $10,052.30 in expenses related to the return of the children. Those costs include postage/deliver services, photocopies, faxes, court reporter fees, computer research, investigation service fees, emergency passports, excess luggage (for the children), meals, attorney lodging costs, Australian domestic flights, international flights, and client lodging. The court awards petitioner the full amount of her expenses finding they were both necessary and reasonable. See 42 U.S.C. § 11067(b)(3), and Fed.R.Civ.P. 54. Therefore, costs in the amount of $10,052.30 are awarded to petitioner.

Petitioner also requests a total of $33,729 in attorney fees. That amount includes the services of four lawyers and one legal assistant ranging in hourly rates from $75 to $300 per hour, for a total of 121 hours. Due primarily to respondent's financial circumstances, particularly his unemployment, and the fact petitioner will be reimbursed all of her expenses, the court finds the request for attorney fees somewhat excessive. Courts have discretion to reduce any potential award to allow for the financial condition of the respondent. See Rydder v. Rydder, 49 F.3d 373-74 (8th Cir. 1995). Further, the court believes a fee award which unduly limits respondent's ability to support his children would be "clearly inappropriate." Consequently, the court reduces petitioner's attorney fee request by 15% resulting in a fee award of $28,669.65. See Rydder, 49 F.3d at 374 (reducing fee award from $18,487 to $10,000 due to respondent's "straitened financial circumstances"); In re Application of Hirts, 2004 WL 1588227 at *1 n. 1 (E.D. Pa, 2004) (reducing requested fee award from $31,958 to $20,000); and Cook v. Cook, 2007 WL 3120122 (D. Ariz. 2007) (reducing requested fee award from $24,187 to $15,000 as "more equitable."). The court will not reduce the fee request beyond 15% in recognition of the legal complexity and logistical difficulty provided by these types of cases generally, and this case in particular. The court further finds that an award of $28,669.65 is sufficient to deter future violations of the Convention.

CONCLUSION

Petitioner's Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs (doc. 44) is granted in the amount of $28,669.65 in attorney fees, and $10,052.30 in costs, for a total award of $38,721.95.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Willing v. Purtill

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Jan 31, 2008
Civ. No. 07-1618-AA (D. Or. Jan. 31, 2008)

reducing fee award by 15% due to respondent's financial circumstances, particularly his unemployment

Summary of this case from Kim v. Ferdinand

reducing fee award by 15% due to respondent's financial circumstances, particularly his unemployment

Summary of this case from Aguilera v. De Lara

reducing fee award by 15% due to respondent's financial circumstances, particularly his unemployment

Summary of this case from Hirst v. Tiberghien

reducing fees by 15% because of respondents' straitened financial circumstances

Summary of this case from Souratgar v. Fair (In re One Infant Child)

reducing fee award by 15% in light of respondent's financial status

Summary of this case from Paulus ex rel. P.F.V. v. Cordero

applying 15 percent reduction to fee award in light of respondent's financial status and not reducing award further because of the legal complexity and logical difficulty generally provided by ICARA cases

Summary of this case from Sullivan v. Sullivan

awarding $28,669.95 in attorney's fees under ICARA

Summary of this case from Neves v. Neves
Case details for

Willing v. Purtill

Case Details

Full title:In re the Application of: TAMMY ELLEN WILLING, Petitioner, v. TREVOR…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Jan 31, 2008

Citations

Civ. No. 07-1618-AA (D. Or. Jan. 31, 2008)

Citing Cases

Sullivan v. Sullivan

42 to $10,000.00 because of Respondent's "straitened financial circumstances"); Berendsen v. Nichols , 938 F.…

Stovall v. Gallegos

Similarly, in Willing v. Purtill the petitioner sought $33,729 in attorneys' fees and $10,052 in costs. No.…