From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Pianka

Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
Nov 28, 2012
2012 Ohio 5518 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. 98760

11-28-2012

In re: LAWRENCE WILLIAMS RELATOR v. RAYMOND PIANKA, AS JUDGE, ETC. RESPONDENT

FOR RELATOR Lawrence Williams, pro se ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT Barbara A. Langhenry Interim Director of Law Joseph F. Scott Chief Assistant Director of Law City of Cleveland


JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION


JUDGMENT:

WRIT DENIED


Writ of Mandamus

Motion No. 458342

Order No. 460163

FOR RELATOR

Lawrence Williams, pro se

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT

Barbara A. Langhenry
Interim Director of Law
By: Joseph F. Scott
Chief Assistant Director of Law
City of Cleveland
EILEEN A. GALLAGHER, J.:

{¶1} Lawrence Williams has filed a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Williams seeks an order from this court that requires Judge Raymond Pianka to issue a ruling with regard to an "emergency motion for temporary restraining order, injunction and stay of eviction" as filed in Cleveland M.C. No. 2012-CVG-010936. Judge Pianka has filed a motion for summary judgment, which is granted for the following reasons.

{¶2} Initially, we find that Williams' complaint for a writ of mandamus is defective, because it is improperly captioned. The complaint for a writ of mandamus must be brought in the name of the state on relation of the person applying. R.C. 2731.04; Maloney v. Court of Common Pleas of Allen Cty., 173 Ohio St. 226, 181 N.E.2d 270 (1962); Gannon v. Gallagher, 145 Ohio St. 170, 60 N.E.2d 666 (1945).

{¶3} Finally, Williams' request for a writ of mandamus is moot. The underlying action, forcible entry and detainer, has concluded and Williams has been evicted from the residential property in question. See affidavit of Judge Pianka attached to the motion for summary judgment. State ex rel. Jerninghan v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 74 Ohio St.3d 278, 658 N.E.2d 723 (1996); State ex rel. Snider v. Stapleton, 65 Ohio St.3d 40, 600 N.E.2d 240 (1992); State ex rel. Richard v. Wells, 64 Ohio St.3d 76, 591 N.E.2d 1240 (1992); State ex rel. Gantt v. Coleman, 6 Ohio St.3d 5, 450 N.E.2d 1163 (1983).

{¶4} Accordingly, we grant Judge Pianka's motion for summary judgment. Williams to pay costs. The court directs the clerk of court to serve all parties with notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal as required by Civ.R. 58(B).

{¶5} Writ denied. ______________________________
EILEEN A. GALLAGHER, JUDGE
MELODY J. STEWART, P.J., and
MARY EILEEN KILBANE, J., CONCUR


Summaries of

Williams v. Pianka

Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
Nov 28, 2012
2012 Ohio 5518 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Williams v. Pianka

Case Details

Full title:In re: LAWRENCE WILLIAMS RELATOR v. RAYMOND PIANKA, AS JUDGE, ETC…

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA

Date published: Nov 28, 2012

Citations

2012 Ohio 5518 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012)