From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex Rel. Jerninghan v. CCCCP

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 10, 1996
74 Ohio St. 3d 278 (Ohio 1996)

Opinion

No. 95-1769

Submitted November 7, 1995 —

Decided January 10, 1996.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 69259.

On July 10, 1995, appellant, Tommie Jerninghan, Jr., filed a complaint in mandamus in the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, alleging that his appeal in case No. CV265857 had been dismissed for lack of a final order, and seeking to compel appellees to file a final order in the case. On July 25, 1995, appellees filed a motion to dismiss the complaint as moot, attaching a copy of an order dismissing case No. CV265857. On July 31, 1995, the court of appeals issued a journal entry dismissing the case.

Appellant appeals to this court as a matter of right.

Tommie Jerninghan, Jr., pro se.


We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. A writ of mandamus will not issue to compel an act already performed. State ex rel. Gantt v. Coleman (1983), 6 Ohio St.3d 5, 6 OBR 4, 450 N.E.2d 1163.

Judgment affirmed.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State ex Rel. Jerninghan v. CCCCP

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 10, 1996
74 Ohio St. 3d 278 (Ohio 1996)
Case details for

State ex Rel. Jerninghan v. CCCCP

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE EX REL. JERNINGHAM, APPELLANT, v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF…

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jan 10, 1996

Citations

74 Ohio St. 3d 278 (Ohio 1996)
658 N.E.2d 723

Citing Cases

Sun v. Lyndhurst Mun. Court

Thus, Sun's complaint for a writ of mandamus is moot. State ex rel. Jerninghan v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of…

Strauss v. Celebrezze

{¶ 2} Strauss' complaint for a writ of prohibition, based on the pendency of two appeals before this court,…