From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Ortega

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 21, 2020
Case No.: 3:18-cv-00547-LAB-MDD (S.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2020)

Opinion

Case No.: 3:18-cv-00547-LAB-MDD

02-21-2020

LANCE WILLIAMS, CDCR #AG-2394, Plaintiff, v. O. ORTEGA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO PROSECUTE HIS CLAIMS

On December 11, Plaintiff Lance Williams filed his first amended complaint against Defendants Bowman, Bustos, Kimani, Lewis, Melgoza (erroneously sued as Malagoza), Ortega, and Valencia. All claims against Melgoza were dismissed, and Melgoza was dismissed as a party. But the amended complaint includes claims against Melgoza back, and again names Melgoza as a Defendant. All claims against Melgoza in the amended complaint are DEEMED STRICKEN, and Melgoza need not respond to them or any more claims in this action.

Another problem is that although Defendants Bowman, Bustos, Lewis, Ortega, and Valencia appeared, they have not filed an answer or moved for dismissal of the claims against them. They joined in the motion to dismiss (Docket no. 26), but that motion only requested dismissal of claims against Kimura and Melgoza. Williams has not requested entry of default against the other Defendants. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Other than filing and serving his complaint, he has taken no other steps to prosecute his claims against them. For example, he did not request an entry of default against them, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a), or move for default judgment. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2). Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) requires plaintiffs to prosecute their claims with reasonable diligence. Although the Court will not lightly dismiss a prisoner's claims for failure to prosecute, Hernandez v. Whiting, 881 F.2d 768, 771 (9 Cir. 1989), this requirement applies even to prisoners. Collins v. Pitchess, 641 F.2d 740, 742 (9 Cir. 1981) ("Every plaintiff in federal court has a responsibility to prosecute his action diligently . . . . Incarceration does not absolve a plaintiff of this responsibility.")

Williams should either dismiss his claims against these Defendants, or immediately begin prosecuting his claims against them. If he does not, these claims may be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 21, 2020

/s/_________

Hon. Larry Alan Burns

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

Williams v. Ortega

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 21, 2020
Case No.: 3:18-cv-00547-LAB-MDD (S.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2020)
Case details for

Williams v. Ortega

Case Details

Full title:LANCE WILLIAMS, CDCR #AG-2394, Plaintiff, v. O. ORTEGA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 21, 2020

Citations

Case No.: 3:18-cv-00547-LAB-MDD (S.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2020)