From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Illinois

U.S.
Jun 28, 2011
564 U.S. 1052 (2011)

Summary

granting certiorari on the question “whether a state rule of evidence allowing an expert witness to testify about the results of DNA testing performed by non-testifying analysts, where the defendant has no opportunity to confront the actual analysts, violates the Confrontation Clause”

Summary of this case from In re Amey

Opinion

No. 10–8505.

06-28-2011

Sandy WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.


Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Illinois granted.


Summaries of

Williams v. Illinois

U.S.
Jun 28, 2011
564 U.S. 1052 (2011)

granting certiorari on the question “whether a state rule of evidence allowing an expert witness to testify about the results of DNA testing performed by non-testifying analysts, where the defendant has no opportunity to confront the actual analysts, violates the Confrontation Clause”

Summary of this case from In re Amey

considering whether an expert may testify about the substance of a DNA analysis report in which he took no part

Summary of this case from Palma v. Cate
Case details for

Williams v. Illinois

Case Details

Full title:SANDY WILLIAMS v. ILLINOIS

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 28, 2011

Citations

564 U.S. 1052 (2011)
564 U.S. 1052
180 L. Ed. 2d 911

Citing Cases

United States v. Ignasiak

Admission of the autopsy reports on solely this testimony—absent evidence that the actual medical examiners…

In re l Hacheney

See p. 9 infra.But we further note that the United States Supreme Court recently heard oral argument in…