From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Fannon

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 31, 2021
2:19-cv-0486 MCE DB P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2021)

Opinion

2:19-cv-0486 MCE DB P

08-31-2021

GENTRY WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. J. FANNON, Defendant.


ORDER

KENDALL J. NEWMAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The undersigned herein addresses plaintiff's failure to comply with the July 19, 2021 order for plaintiff to pay sanctions of $1000.

On May 25, 2021, the undersigned conducted a settlement conference in this action. This action settled. Pursuant to the terms of the settlement that were placed on the record, defendant agreed to pay plaintiff $2500 and the parties agreed to dismiss this action with prejudice.

At the settlement conference, the parties agreed that the transcript from the settlement conference would be the formal settlement agreement. (See ECF No. 47 (transcript from settlement conference).)

At the settlement conference, the undersigned instructed plaintiff to prepare and send defendant a notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice of this action. Upon receipt of the notice of dismissal, the undersigned directed defendant to sign and file the notice of dismissal within thirty days of May 25, 2021.

Following the settlement conference, defendant provided the court with proof of payment of the settlement money.

Plaintiff did not comply with the order to send defendant the notice of dismissal. Instead, plaintiff filed a document titled “Private Settlement Agreement and Release of All Claims on Defendant J. Fannon.” (ECF No. 49.) This document is not a notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice. This document also significantly misrepresents the terms of the settlement and does not contain defendant Fannon's signature.

On June 25, 2021, the undersigned ordered plaintiff to mail defendant Fannon a signed notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice within fourteen days of the order. (ECF No. 50.) The undersigned ordered defendant to sign and file this notice within thirty days of the order. (Id.) If defendant Fannon did not receive the notice from plaintiff within fourteen days, the undersigned directed defendant Fannon to notify the court. (Id.) In the June 25, 2021 order, the undersigned cautioned plaintiff that failure to comply with the order may result in the imposition of monetary sanctions. (Id.)

On July 14, 2021, defendant Fannon filed a notice stating that he did not receive a notice of voluntary dismissal from plaintiff within fourteen days of the June 25, 2021 order. (ECF No. 51.)

On July 19, 2021, the undersigned dismissed this action with prejudice. (ECF No. 52.) The undersigned also ordered plaintiff to pay, within fourteen days of the date of the order, sanctions of $1000.00 for his failure to comply with the June 25, 2021 order directing him to send defendant Fannon a notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice. (Id.) Fourteen days passed and plaintiff did not pay the sanctions.

Accordingly, the undersigned herein refers this action to the Office of the California Attorney General and the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) to determine whether plaintiff has sufficient money in his trust account to pay the sanctions ordered in the July 19, 2021 order. If plaintiff has sufficient money to pay the sanctions, the Office of the California Attorney General and/or CDCR shall take appropriate measures to ensure that plaintiff complies with the July 19, 2021 order. If plaintiff does not have sufficient money in his trust account to pay the sanctions, the undersigned orders that any money plaintiff receives from future settlements or judgments shall be applied toward the sanctions ordered in the July 19, 2021 order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This action is referred to the Office of California Attorney General and CDCR to determine whether plaintiff has sufficient money in his trust account to pay the sanctions ordered in the July 19, 2021 order; if plaintiff has sufficient money, the Office of the California Attorney General and/or CDCR shall take appropriate measures to ensure that plaintiff complies with the July 19, 2021 order;

2. If plaintiff does not have sufficient money in his trust account to pay the sanctions, any money plaintiff receives from future settlements or judgments shall be applied toward the sanctions ordered in the July 19, 2021 order;

3. The Clerk of the Court shall serve this order on Supervising Deputy Attorney General Monica Anderson.


Summaries of

Williams v. Fannon

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 31, 2021
2:19-cv-0486 MCE DB P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2021)
Case details for

Williams v. Fannon

Case Details

Full title:GENTRY WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. J. FANNON, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 31, 2021

Citations

2:19-cv-0486 MCE DB P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2021)