From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. A. Hollander Son, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 28, 1936
249 App. Div. 784 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Opinion

December 28, 1936.


Order granting a preference in the trial of a personal injury action reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, without costs. Since the plaintiff and the defendants are not residents of Orange county, in which the venue is laid, the plaintiff may not have a preference granted to him. ( Caulfield v. Weil, 232 App. Div. 828; Kupfer v. E.A. White Organization, Inc., 230 id. 731; Defina v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Company, 211 id. 870; Chopak v. Olvany, 235 id. 743.) The defendants, being foreign corporations, are not residents of Orange county even though they possess a certificate authorizing them to do business in the State. ( Remington Sherman Co. v. Niagara Bank, 54 App. Div. 358. ) The rule that a railroad corporation (foreign or domestic) may be sued in any county through which its railroad is operated is confined to railroad corporations. ( General Banking Co. v. Daniell, 181 App. Div. 501; Polley v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Co., 138 id. 636; Poland v. United Traction Co., 88 id. 281.) Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Adel, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Williams v. A. Hollander Son, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 28, 1936
249 App. Div. 784 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
Case details for

Williams v. A. Hollander Son, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:HOWARD WILLIAMS, Respondent, v. A. HOLLANDER SON, INC., and ATLAS FUR…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 28, 1936

Citations

249 App. Div. 784 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Citing Cases

Taller Cooper, Inc. v. Rand

The respondent is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of New Jersey. Therefore,…

Schwartz v. Zim Israel Navigation Co.

The authorities are to the contrary. See Taller Cooper, Inc., v. Rand ( 286 App. Div. 1096, 1097); Remington…