From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Caulfield v. Weil

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1931
232 App. Div. 828 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)

Opinion

March, 1931.


Order granting plaintiff's motion for a preference reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The record discloses without dispute that the plaintiff is not a resident of Kings county. He may not, therefore, have a preference granted to him in an action which should have been brought in Queens county, since plaintiff and all the defendants are residents of that county. Lazansky, P.J., Kapper, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Caulfield v. Weil

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1931
232 App. Div. 828 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)
Case details for

Caulfield v. Weil

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE T. CAULFIELD, Respondent, v. JOSEPH WEIL and HERMAN RAHN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1931

Citations

232 App. Div. 828 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)

Citing Cases

Williams v. A. Hollander Son, Inc.

Since the plaintiff and the defendants are not residents of Orange county, in which the venue is laid, the…

Fuchs v. Nation Wide Air Transportation, Inc.

Order reversed on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, without…