From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilhelm v. Bruning

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
May 25, 2010
No. CIV-09-1050-C (W.D. Okla. May. 25, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV-09-1050-C.

May 25, 2010


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation entered by United States Magistrate Judge Bana Roberts on April 16, 2010. The court file reflects that no party has objected to the Report and Recommendation within the time limits prescribed. Therefore, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety.

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 8) is adopted and Plaintiff's civil rights complaint is dismissed. As no amendment can cure the defect, the dismissal as an adjudication and a judgment shall enter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Wilhelm v. Bruning

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
May 25, 2010
No. CIV-09-1050-C (W.D. Okla. May. 25, 2010)
Case details for

Wilhelm v. Bruning

Case Details

Full title:JUSTIN WILHELM, Plaintiff, v. MARK BRUNING, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Date published: May 25, 2010

Citations

No. CIV-09-1050-C (W.D. Okla. May. 25, 2010)

Citing Cases

Johnson v. Balkman

“Oklahoma district courts are courts of general jurisdiction.” Wilhelm v. Bruning, No. CIV-09-1050-C, 2010 WL…