From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whitmore v. Anthony Russo, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 8, 1999
266 A.D.2d 282 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Argued October 1, 1999

November 8, 1999

Michael F.X. Manning, Garden City, N.Y. (John P. Humphreys and David Holland of counsel), for defendant third-party plaintiff-appellant.

Karl, Clerkin, Redmond, Ryan, Perry Girvan, Mineola, N Y (Margaret L. Pezzino of counsel), for third-party defendant-respondent.

WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, J.P., ANITA R. FLORIO, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant third-party plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (LeVine, J.), dated August 26, 1998, which, upon reargument, granted the motion of the third-party defendant to dismiss the third-party complaint, which motion had previously been denied by order of the same court dated September 3, 1997.

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion for reargument is denied.

The Supreme Court erred in dismissing the third-party action pursuant to the Omnibus Worker's Compensation Reform Act (Workers' Compensation Law § 11 , L 1996, ch 635, as amended) (hereinafter the Act). While the third-party action was commenced after the effective date of the Act, the main action was commenced by the plaintiffs before the effective date. Accordingly, the Act does not bar the third-party action (see, Majewski v. Broadalbin-Perth Cent. School Dist., 91 N.Y.2d 577, 590; see also, Browning v. County Fence Company, 259 A.D.2d 578 [2d Dept., Mar. 15, 1999]; Esposito v. Bob Iko Excavation, 258 A.D.2d 555 [2d Dept., Feb. 16, 1 999]; Maher v. Whitehead, 254 A.D.2d 263 ; Blessinger v. Estee Lauder Cos., 246 A.D.2d 363 ; Caponi v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co., 177 Misc.2d 47, 49 ).

FRIEDMANN, J.P., FLORIO, SCHMIDT, and SMITH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Whitmore v. Anthony Russo, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 8, 1999
266 A.D.2d 282 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Whitmore v. Anthony Russo, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:EUGENE WHITMORE, et al., plaintiffs, v. ANTHONY RUSSO, INC., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 8, 1999

Citations

266 A.D.2d 282 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
699 N.Y.S.2d 57

Citing Cases

Hundley v. Prince Street Associates

Specifically, the Supreme Court erroneously determined that Gordon's common-law indemnification claim against…

Dudek v. Metro. Transp. Auth

As such, Safeway maintains that the "grave injury" requirement is applicable to the second third-party action…