From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maher v. Whitehead

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 5, 1998
254 A.D.2d 263 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

October 5, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Bellantoni, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly concluded that the Omnibus Worker's Compensation Reform Act of 1996 (L 1996, ch 635, § 2), is inapplicable under the circumstances presented ( see, Majewski v. Broadalbin-Perth Cent. School Dist., 91 N.Y.2d 577; cf., Morales v. Gross, 230 A.D.2d 7; see also, Blessinger v. Estee Lauder Cos., 246 A.D.2d 363; Caponi v. Great Atl. Pac. Tea Co., 177 Misc.2d 47; Delacruz v. Wistyn, NYLJ, Nov. 3, 1997, at 27, col 6; Seymour v. Balata Belting Co., 174 Misc.2d 677).

O'Brien., J. P., Thompson, Sullivan and Friedmann, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Maher v. Whitehead

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 5, 1998
254 A.D.2d 263 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Maher v. Whitehead

Case Details

Full title:ELIZABETH MAHER, Plaintiff, v. LOIS WHITEHEAD, Defendant and Third-Party…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 5, 1998

Citations

254 A.D.2d 263 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
678 N.Y.S.2d 271

Citing Cases

Whitmore v. Anthony Russo, Inc.

The Supreme Court erred in dismissing the third-party action pursuant to the Omnibus Worker's Compensation…

ESPOSITO v. BOB IKO EXCAVATION

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. The Supreme Court properly concluded that the Omnibus…