From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

West v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Jun 5, 2013
115 So. 3d 1047 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

Opinion

No. 4D12–4128.

2013-06-5

James WEST, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Paul L. Backman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 98–18975 CF10A. James West, Mayo, Pro Se. No appearance required for appellee.


Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Paul L. Backman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 98–18975 CF10A.
James West, Mayo, Pro Se. No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court's summary denial of appellant's untimely, successive, and frivolous postconviction challenge. Appellant filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the trial court attempting to challenge his March 1999 conviction for robbery.

A petition for writ of habeas corpus may not be used as substitute for a Rule 3.850 motion. SeeFla. R.Crim. P. 3.850( l); Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236, 1241 (Fla.2004). A postconviction motion would be untimely and successive in this case as petitioner has already filed numerous postconviction challenges and appeals. Appellant has now initiated fifteen cases in this court.

Appellant claims that the trial court lacked jurisdiction because the prosecutor had allegedly not received sworn testimony from a material witness before filing the information. This claim is frivolous. Norman v. State, 110 So.3d 472, 472 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013); Sears v. State, ––– So.3d –––– (Fla. 4th DCA 2013); Collins v. State, 97 So.3d 305 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012); Logan v. State, 1 So.3d 1253, 1254 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009); Logan v. State, 21 So.3d 917 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).

The clerk is directed to send a certified copy of this opinion to the appropriate institution for disciplinary procedures. § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2012). Appellant is cautioned that any further frivolous or malicious filing will result in this court imposing the sanction of no longer accepting his pro se filings. State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999).

Affirmed; Appellant referred to prison officials.

STEVENSON, DAMOORGIAN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

West v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Jun 5, 2013
115 So. 3d 1047 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)
Case details for

West v. State

Case Details

Full title:James WEST, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: Jun 5, 2013

Citations

115 So. 3d 1047 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

Citing Cases

Watkins v. State

See §§ 775.082(3)(a)(4), 800.04(5)(b), Fla. Stat. (2005); Carbajal v. State, 75 So.3d 258 (Fla.2011); State…

Thompkins v. State

Affirmed. See §§ 775.084(4)(b)(3), 784.011, 784.021, Fla. Stat. (2010) ; Vernold v. State, 376 So.2d 1166…