Opinion
No. 2D14–2212.
10-22-2014
Chandler Thompkins, pro se.
Chandler Thompkins, pro se.
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See §§ 775.084(4)(b)(3), 784.011, 784.021, Fla. Stat. (2010) ; Vernold v. State, 376 So.2d 1166 (Fla.1979) ; Doby v. State, 25 So.3d 598 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) ; Hughes v. State, 22 So.3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) ; Waiter v. State, 965 So.2d 861 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) ; Bizzell v. State, 912 So.2d 386 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) ; Nedd v. State, 855 So.2d 664 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) ; West v. State, 115 So.3d 1047 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) ; Collins v. State, 97 So.3d 305 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) ; Logan v. State, 1 So.3d 1253 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) ; Sanchez v. State, 979 So.2d 1004 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) ; Mills v. State, 840 So.2d 464 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) ; Harris v. State, 789 So.2d 1114 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).
ALTENBERND, VILLANTI, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.