From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wess v. Olympia & York Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 15, 1994
201 A.D.2d 365 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

February 15, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Stuart C. Cohen, J.).


Under CPLR 3012 (b), a plaintiff who has commenced an action by service of a summons without complaint and upon whom a demand has been made for service of the complaint has 20 days in which to comply with that demand. A plaintiff who wishes to serve a complaint after the 20 days has expired must demonstrate the merits of the cause of action as well as a reasonable excuse for the delay (Barasch v. Micucci, 49 N.Y.2d 594, 599).

In this case, we find that plaintiff has satisfied that burden. Although the affidavit of merits was signed only by plaintiff's attorney, as it was based on the personal knowledge of that attorney it was adequate to establish the merits of plaintiff's claim. Moreover, plaintiff clearly established a reasonable excuse for the delay in timely serving the complaint. Such a delay may be justified by law office failure (CPLR 2005). In this case, the error on plaintiff's counsel's part as to whether a complaint had been served on the correct defendant which led to the delay was directly related to the difficulties engendered by the numerous entities doing business under the rubric "Olympia and York," as well as defendant's insurer's refusal to identify the correct entity.

Concur — Carro, J.P., Rosenberger, Ellerin and Kupferman, JJ.


Summaries of

Wess v. Olympia & York Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 15, 1994
201 A.D.2d 365 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Wess v. Olympia & York Realty Corp.

Case Details

Full title:PAUL H. WESS, Appellant, v. OLYMPIA AND YORK REALTY CORP. et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 15, 1994

Citations

201 A.D.2d 365 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
607 N.Y.S.2d 335

Citing Cases

Ross v. Rinnert

CPLR 3012(b) provides that if an action is commenced by summons without a complaint, a defendant may serve a…

OLSEN v. WARSHAW BURSTEIN COHEN SCHLESINGER KUH

A plaintiff who wishes to serve a complaint after the 20 days has expired must demonstrate the merits of the…