From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weissglass v. Weissglass

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 17, 1976
52 A.D.2d 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

May 17, 1976


Order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, entered February 10, 1976, affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The defendant has failed to show a genuine necessity for more temporary alimony than was granted by Special Term. The parties are directed to proceed to an immediate trial. The remedy for any seeming inequity in a temporary order of alimony is a speedy trial, at which the rights of the parties may be fully determined (Thomases v Thomases, 51 A.D.2d 753). Hopkins, Acting P.J., Martuscello, Latham, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Weissglass v. Weissglass

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 17, 1976
52 A.D.2d 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

Weissglass v. Weissglass

Case Details

Full title:OSCAR WEISSGLASS, Respondent, v. ROSE E. WEISSGLASS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 17, 1976

Citations

52 A.D.2d 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Citing Cases

Fredenburgh v. Fredenburgh

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. Generally, the remedy for any…