Opinion
November 9, 1992
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Walsh, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Generally, the remedy for any seeming inequity in the award or denial of temporary maintenance is a speedy trial at which the rights of the parties may be fully determined (see, Weissglass v Weissglass, 52 A.D.2d 923; Thomases v Thomases, 51 A.D.2d 753). Accordingly, the parties should proceed to trial to resolve all issues. In any event, the Supreme Court made a reasonable accommodation between the needs of the plaintiff wife and the defendant husband's financial ability to pay for those needs (see, Crowley v Crowley, 120 A.D.2d 559; Stern v Stern, 106 A.D.2d 631). Bracken, J.P., Lawrence, Miller, Copertino and Santucci, JJ., concur.