From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weil v. Chandler

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Nov 15, 1962
38 Misc. 2d 58 (N.Y. App. Term 1962)

Opinion

November 15, 1962

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, MAXWELL SHAPIRO, J.

Benjamin H. Whitestone for appellant.

Jack Newton Lerner for respondent.


The tenant had been in possession for 12 years, apparently without difficulty, until the present landlord became the owner of the property in October, 1960. The late payment of rent was due to the tenant's temporary financial embarrassment, and not to any studied purpose to harass the landlord. Nor was the late payment so aggravated and long-continued as to establish a pattern. In the circumstances, eviction of this tenant would result in unwarranted hardship. The rule of the cases decided in this court, such as Zalaznick v. Imbembo ( 35 Misc.2d 164) and 940 St. Nicholas Ave. Corp. v. Grant ( 35 Misc.2d 165) is inapplicable to the present situation and it was error to direct a final order for the landlord.

The final order should be reversed, with $30 costs, and final order directed in favor of tenant, dismissing the petition, with costs.

Concur — HECHT, J.P., HOFSTADTER and GOLD, JJ.

Final order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Weil v. Chandler

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Nov 15, 1962
38 Misc. 2d 58 (N.Y. App. Term 1962)
Case details for

Weil v. Chandler

Case Details

Full title:DOROTHY WEIL, Respondent, v. FRED CHANDLER, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Nov 15, 1962

Citations

38 Misc. 2d 58 (N.Y. App. Term 1962)
239 N.Y.S.2d 514

Citing Cases

Park Summit Realty Corp. v. Frank

In such a case, a "permanent tenant" may be expeditiously removed by a nonpayment proceeding. That section…

National Shoes v. Annex Camera

The respondent's conduct is not excusable on the grounds that its failure to pay rent is an isolated…