From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Esther Zalaznick v. Arthur Imbembo

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jun 14, 1962
35 Misc. 2d 164 (N.Y. App. Term 1962)

Opinion

June 14, 1962

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of The Bronx, SAMUEL R. ROSENBERG, J.

Abraham J. Yasgour for appellant.


Where the landlord has presented irrefutable proof that tenant violated a substantial obligation of his tenancy by repeated and unjustified refusal to pay his rent when due, which necessitated 13 separate dispossess proceedings over a period of 21 months, a final order in favor of the landlord should have been granted. (See 974 Realty Corp. v. Ledford, 9 Misc.2d 240; Gilbert v. Becker, 142 N.Y.S.2d 888; Stern v. Harrold, 12 Misc.2d 73; Rental Realty Corp. v. Lawrence, 14 Misc.2d 1070; Stern v. Carroll, 28 Misc.2d 507.)

The final order in favor of tenant should be reversed, with $30 costs and final order directed in favor of landlord, as prayed for in the petition, with costs.

Concur — HECHT, J.P., HOFSTADTER and TILZER, JJ.

Final order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Esther Zalaznick v. Arthur Imbembo

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jun 14, 1962
35 Misc. 2d 164 (N.Y. App. Term 1962)
Case details for

Esther Zalaznick v. Arthur Imbembo

Case Details

Full title:ESTHER ZALAZNICK, Appellant, v. ARTHUR IMBEMBO, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jun 14, 1962

Citations

35 Misc. 2d 164 (N.Y. App. Term 1962)
232 N.Y.S.2d 442

Citing Cases

Westchester Plaza Holdings, LLC v. Furlow

It is well-settled that an obligation to pay rent under a lease in a timely manner is a primary obligation of…

Weil v. Chandler

In the circumstances, eviction of this tenant would result in unwarranted hardship. The rule of the cases…