From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wayte v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Dec 30, 2022
353 So. 3d 688 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

Case No. 5D22-1251.

12-30-2022

Jonathan Michael WAYTE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Matthew J. Metz , Public Defender, and Ali L. Hansen , Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Ashley Moody , Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Daniel P. Caldwell , Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Matthew J. Metz , Public Defender, and Ali L. Hansen , Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody , Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Daniel P. Caldwell , Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders case, we affirm the judgment and sentence but remand for a corrected costs order that identifies the authority for each cost.

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED with INSTRUCTIONS.

WALLIS, EDWARDS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wayte v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Dec 30, 2022
353 So. 3d 688 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Wayte v. State

Case Details

Full title:Jonathan Michael WAYTE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Dec 30, 2022

Citations

353 So. 3d 688 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)