From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watson Finance Co. Inc. v. Fisher

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
May 16, 2012
2012-UP-306 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 16, 2012)

Opinion

2012-UP-306

05-16-2012

Watson Finance Co. Inc., Appellant, v. Sue M. Fisher, Respondent.

Kenneth E. Sowell, of Anderson, for Appellant. Rodney M. Brown, of Fountain Inn, for Respondent.


Unpublished Opinion

Submitted May 1, 2012

Appeal From Greenville County G. Edward Welmaker, Circuit Court Judge

Kenneth E. Sowell, of Anderson, for Appellant.

Rodney M. Brown, of Fountain Inn, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Watson Finance Company (Company) appeals the circuit court's order, arguing the circuit court erred in affirming the magistrate's order directing a verdict in favor of Fisher because the magistrate improperly excluded Company's testimony regarding the price of a repair bill. We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities: Butler v. Edgefield, 328 S.C. 238, 248, 493 S.E.2d 838, 843 (1997) (holding the circuit court, acting as an appellate court in a case heard by the magistrate, cannot consider questions that have not been presented to the magistrate); Taylor v. Medenica, 324 S.C 200, 216, 479 S.E.2d 35, 43 (1996) (holding a party may not argue one ground at trial and an alternate ground on appeal).

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

AFFIRMED.

WILLIAMS, THOMAS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Watson Finance Co. Inc. v. Fisher

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
May 16, 2012
2012-UP-306 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 16, 2012)
Case details for

Watson Finance Co. Inc. v. Fisher

Case Details

Full title:Watson Finance Co. Inc., Appellant, v. Sue M. Fisher, Respondent.

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: May 16, 2012

Citations

2012-UP-306 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 16, 2012)