From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Washington v. Warden SVSP

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Dec 13, 2021
21-06844 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Dec. 13, 2021)

Opinion

21-06844 BLF (PR)

12-13-2021

CHRISTOPHER N. WASHINGTON, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN SVSP, et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF; INSTRUCTIONS TO CLERK (DOCKET NO. 10)

BETH LABSON FREEMAN, United States District Judge

On September 3, 2021, Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Dkt. No. 1. On the same day, the Clerk notified Plaintiff that he failed to file a complete in forma pauperis application (“IFP”). Dkt. No. 4. Plaintiff was advised that failure to respond within twenty-eight days of the notice would result in the action being dismissed without prejudice. Id. When the deadline passed without a response from Plaintiff, the Court dismissed the matter for failure to pay the filing fee on November 12, 2021, and entered judgment the same day. Dkt. Nos. 8, 9.

This matter was reassigned to this Court on October 8, 2021, after Plaintiff did not file consent to magistrate jurisdiction in the time provided. Dkt. No. 7.

On December 1, 2021, Plaintiff filed an “ex-parte motion for administrative relief… with notice of address change, ” Dkt. No. 10, and a notice of change of address, Dkt. No. 11. It is unclear whether Plaintiff received the Court's Order of Dismissal and Judgment since it appears he was transferred to another prison while this matter was pending. He requests information regarding the payment of fees and copies of his filings without mention of the dismissal. Accordingly, Plaintiffs request is GRANTED. Plaintiff is advised that the total filing fee that is due on this matter is $350. See Dkt. No. 4.

Plaintiff is advised that this matter has been closed. If Plaintiff wants to move the Court for relief from judgment and have this action reopened, he may file a motion for reconsideration showing good cause no later than twenty-eight (28) days from the date this order is filed. Along with the motion for reconsideration, Plaintiff must file a complete IFP motion or pay the full filing fee.

The Clerk shall enclose a copy of Plaintiff s complaint, Dkt. No. 1, copies of the Court's Order of Dismissal and Judgment, Dkt. Nos. 8, 9, a copy of the IFP application, and a copy of the docket.

This order terminates Docket No. 10.

IT IS SO ORDERED. .


Summaries of

Washington v. Warden SVSP

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Dec 13, 2021
21-06844 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Dec. 13, 2021)
Case details for

Washington v. Warden SVSP

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER N. WASHINGTON, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN SVSP, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Dec 13, 2021

Citations

21-06844 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Dec. 13, 2021)