From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Washington v. Sutton

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 17, 2022
1:20-cv-00983-AWI-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 17, 2022)

Opinion

1:20-cv-00983-AWI-GSA-PC

06-17-2022

ISAIAH WASHINGTON, Plaintiff, v. SUTTON, et al., Defendants.


New Deadline to File Exhaustion Motions: August 24, 2022

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER (ECF No. 37.) ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE EXHAUSTION MOTIONS FOR ALL PARTIES

GARY S. AUSTIN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

I. BACKGROUND

Isaiah Washington (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case now proceeds against Defendants M. Sturges, O. Navarro, and J. Cornejo (“Defendants”) for use of excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 1.)

On January 3, 2022, the Court issued an order for this case to proceed only with Plaintiff's excessive force claims against defendants Sturges, Navarro, and Cornejo, and dismissing all other claims and defendants. (ECF No. 25.)

On March 25, 2022, the court issued a Discovery and Scheduling Order establishing pretrial deadlines for the parties, including an Exhaustion Motion Filing Deadline of June 25, 2022. (ECF No. 32.) On June 16, 2022, Defendants filed a motion to modify the Scheduling Order. (ECF No. 37.) 1

II. MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER

Modification of a scheduling order requires a showing of good cause, Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(b), and good cause requires a showing of due diligence, Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 609 (9th Cir. 1992). To establish good cause, the party seeking the modification of a scheduling order must generally show that even with the exercise of due diligence, they cannot meet the requirement of the order. Id. The court may also consider the prejudice to the party opposing the modification. Id. If the party seeking to amend the scheduling order fails to show due diligence the inquiry should end and the court should not grant the motion to modify. Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison, Co., 302 F.3d 1080, 1087 (9th Cir. 2002).

The Court finds good cause to extend the deadline for the filing of exhaustion motions in the Court's Discovery and Scheduling Order to the date of August 24, 2022 . Therefore, the motion to modify the Scheduling Order filed by Defendants on June 16, 2022 shall be granted. III. CONCLUSION

Based on the foregoing and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants' motion to modify the Court's Scheduling Order, filed on June 16, 2022, is GRANTED;

2. The deadline for filing exhaustion motions is extended from June 25, 2022 to August 24, 2022 for all parties to this action; and

3. All other provisions of the court's March 25, 2022 Discovery and Scheduling

Order remain the same.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 2


Summaries of

Washington v. Sutton

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 17, 2022
1:20-cv-00983-AWI-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 17, 2022)
Case details for

Washington v. Sutton

Case Details

Full title:ISAIAH WASHINGTON, Plaintiff, v. SUTTON, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 17, 2022

Citations

1:20-cv-00983-AWI-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 17, 2022)