From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Warminski v. Warminski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 23, 1987
127 A.D.2d 831 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

February 23, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCaffrey, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Special Term properly exercised its discretion in directing the plaintiff to respond to certain items contained in the demand for a bill of particulars (see, CPLR 3041; Lasini v. Lasini, 111 A.D.2d 907; Frederick v. Frederick, 92 A.D.2d 1058; Anonymous v Anonymous, 71 A.D.2d 209; 1 Foster and Freed, Law and the Family § 5:30). If the plaintiff is unable to provide precise dates and locations with respect to the items contained in the defendant's demand for a bill of particulars, she shall provide approximations of the information sought to the best of her ability. Mollen, P.J., Bracken, Lawrence and Sullivan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Warminski v. Warminski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 23, 1987
127 A.D.2d 831 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Warminski v. Warminski

Case Details

Full title:ANITA WARMINSKI, Appellant, v. SIGMUND WARMINSKI, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 23, 1987

Citations

127 A.D.2d 831 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)