From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ward v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Oct 11, 2017
227 So. 3d 761 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

dismissing a petition for writ of mandamus as moot where the trial court had ruled on the pleading pending below

Summary of this case from Hines v. State
See 1 Summary

Opinion

CASE NO. 1D17–1526

10-11-2017

Romeo WARD, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Romeo Ward, pro se, Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Romeo Ward, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Because the trial court has ruled on the pleading pending below, the petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed as moot. See Ward v. State, 770 So.2d 206 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (dismissing a petition for writ of mandamus as moot where the trial court had ruled on the pleading pending below).

ROBERTS, KELSEY, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.

Summaries of

Ward v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Oct 11, 2017
227 So. 3d 761 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

dismissing a petition for writ of mandamus as moot where the trial court had ruled on the pleading pending below

Summary of this case from Hines v. State
Case details for

Ward v. State

Case Details

Full title:Romeo WARD, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Oct 11, 2017

Citations

227 So. 3d 761 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

Citing Cases

Hines v. State

Because the trial court has ruled on the pleading pending below, the petition for writ of mandamus is…

1 Citing Cases