From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hines v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Apr 23, 2021
315 So. 3d 794 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 1D20-2229

04-23-2021

Charles E. HINES IV, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Charles E. Hines IV, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Charles E. Hines IV, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

Because the trial court has ruled on the pleading pending below, the petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed as moot. See Ward v. State , 227 So. 3d 761 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (dismissing a petition for writ of mandamus as moot where the trial court had ruled on the pleading pending below). Petitioner's request for payment pursuant to section 79.05, Florida Statutes, is denied.

Rowe, Makar, and Osterhaus, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hines v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Apr 23, 2021
315 So. 3d 794 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Hines v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES E. HINES IV, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Apr 23, 2021

Citations

315 So. 3d 794 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)