From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wallingford v. Wood

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Feb 28, 1914
139 P. 252 (Okla. 1914)

Opinion

No. 3474

Opinion Filed February 28, 1914.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Dismissal — Brief. Where plaintiff in error has filed no brief, as required by rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi), the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution.

(Syllabus by Rittenhouse, C.)

Error from Superior Court, Custer County; J. W. Lawter, Judge.

Action in replevin by Lydia L. Wallingford against C. B. Wood and the Bonebrake-Lacy Hardware Company. Judgment for the defendants, and plaintiff brings error. Dismissed.

M. L. Holcombe, for plaintiff in error.

Shull McKnight, for defendants in error.


This appeal was filed in this court January 2, 1912. Neither party has filed a brief, nor have they offered any excuse for the failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned. The appeal should therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution under rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi). Streeter v. McCoy, 34 Okla. 490, 126 P. 216; Thompson v. Murray, 34 Okla. 521, 125 P. 1133; Streeter v. Huene, 34 Okla. 491, 126 P. 216; Reliable Ins. Co. v. Newcomber, 34 Okla. 759, 127 P. 260; M., O. G. Ry. Co. v. Johnson, 34 Okla. 816, 127 P. 386; First Nat. Bank v. Baldwin, 34 Okla. 825, 127 P. 260; Snow v. Frye, 34 Okla. 826, 127 P. 422.

By the Court: It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Wallingford v. Wood

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Feb 28, 1914
139 P. 252 (Okla. 1914)
Case details for

Wallingford v. Wood

Case Details

Full title:WALLINGFORD v. WOOD et al

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Feb 28, 1914

Citations

139 P. 252 (Okla. 1914)
139 P. 252

Citing Cases

Howard Mercantile Co. v. Squires, County Judge

Neither party has filed a brief, nor have they offered any excuse for the failure to do so. It is evident…

Board of Com'rs of Tulsa County v. Cline

On January 19, 1912, the case-made was filed in this court; on January 13, 1914, this case was due to be…