From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reliable Ins. Co. v. Newcomber

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Oct 15, 1912
127 P. 260 (Okla. 1912)

Opinion

No. 2140

Opinion Filed October 15, 1912.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Dismissal — Filing of Brief. Where plaintiff in error has filed no brief, as required by rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi), the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution.

(Syllabus by Robertson, C.)

Error from Kiowa County Court; J. W. Mansell, Judge.

Action by W. H. Newcomber against the Reliable Insurance Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Dismissed.

O. L. Price and Morse Standeven, for plaintiff in error.

Hays, Carpenter Hughes, for defendant in error.


This appeal was filed in this court November 21, 1910. Neither party has filed a brief, nor is there any excuse offered for their failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned. The appeal should therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution, under rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi). Hass v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 P. 543; Maddin v. McCormick, 27 Okla. 779, 117 P. 200; Bender v. Bender et al., 30 Okla. 288, 119 P. 205; Cox v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 296, 119 P. 205; McClelland v. Witherall, 30 Okla. 287, 119 P. 205.

By the Court: It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Reliable Ins. Co. v. Newcomber

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Oct 15, 1912
127 P. 260 (Okla. 1912)
Case details for

Reliable Ins. Co. v. Newcomber

Case Details

Full title:RELIABLE INS. CO. v. NEWCOMBER

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Oct 15, 1912

Citations

127 P. 260 (Okla. 1912)
127 P. 260

Citing Cases

Wallingford v. Wood

Neither party has filed a brief, nor have they offered any excuse for the failure to do so. It is evident…

Turner Hardware Co. v. John Deere Plow Co.

In any event, it should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Streeter v. McCoy, 34 Okla. 490, 126 P. 216;…