Wallace v. F.E.M.A.

Full title: Donald WALLACE; Michael Boockholdt, Plaintiffs--Appellants, v. FEDERAL…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jun 17, 2002

36 F. App'x 637 (9th Cir. 2002)

Opinion

36 Fed.Appx. 637 (9th Cir. 2002) Donald WALLACE; Michael Boockholdt, Plaintiffs--Appellants, v. FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY, Defendant--Appellee. No. 01-15675. D.C. No. CV-99-01471-VRW. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. June 17, 2002

Submitted June 10, 2002. ^*

* This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument and denies appellants' request for oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Vaughn R. Walker, District Judge, Presiding.

Before O'SCANNLAIN, BERZON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM ^**

** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Donald Wallace and Michael Boockholdt appeal the district court's summary judgment in favor of the Federal Emergency Management Agency. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Flick v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 205 F.3d 386, 390 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 927, 121 S.Ct. 305, 148 L.Ed.2d 245 (2000), and we affirm, see id. at 396-97.

AFFIRMED.