Opinion
No. 12-06-00389-CR
March 30, 2007. DO NOT PUBLISH.
Appeal from the Third Appellant Judicial District Court of Anderson County, Texas.
Panel consisted of WORTHEN, C.J., GRIFFITH, J., and HOYLE, J.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Latrena Shanna Walker appeals the revocation of her community supervision, following which she was sentenced to confinement for two years. In one issue, Appellant argues that the trial court's finding that "all the allegations have been proven by the state" is supported by neither legally nor factually sufficient evidence. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
Appellant was charged by indictment with forgery of a financial instrument and pleaded "guilty." The trial court found Appellant "guilty" and sentenced her to confinement for two years. Thereafter, the trial court suspended Appellant's sentence and placed her on community supervision for five years. On September 2, 2006, the State filed its first amended motion to revoke Appellant's community supervision alleging that Appellant had violated certain terms and conditions thereof. Specifically, the State alleged that Appellant violated her community supervision as follows:(1) . . . [Appellant unlawfully appropriated], by acquiring or otherwise exercising control over, property, to-wit: beer, of the value of less than $50, from Brianna Hart (Krogers), the owner thereof, without the effective consent of the owner, and with intent to deprive the owner of the property.
. . . [Appellant] intentionally or knowingly, with intent to defraud or harm another, pass[ed] to Brianna Hart, a forged writing, knowing such writing to be forged, and such writing had been so made; completed; executed; or authenticated that it purported to be the act of Stacy Marcum, who did not authorize the act, and said writing was a check of the tenor following:
. . . .
. . . [Appellant] failed to abstain from the use of narcotic drugs or other controlled substance in any form except as prescribed by a licensed physician for legitimate medical purposes; to wit:
. . . [Appellant] submitted to urinalysis drug testing through Anderson County Community Supervision and Corrections Department on 04.12.06 to determine whether or not [she] was using or under the influence of narcotic drugs or any other controlled substances. Moreover, on 04.20.06[,] the results of said urinalysis testing indicated the presence of Cocaine.
. . . .
. . . [Appellant] failed to pay the cost of urinalysis drug test, a total of $15.00 in arrears.
. . . .
. . . [Appellant] failed to pay the cost of Substance Abuse Evaluation, a total of $5.00 in arrears.
. . . .
. . . [Appellant] failed to perform community service restitution each week as ordered by the Court for the months of: February, March, April, May, and June 2006.
. . . .
. . . [Appellant] failed to pay to the Anderson County Community Supervision and Corrections Department reimbursement for probationer's appointed counsel at the rate of $20.00 per month, for a total of $120.00 in arrears.
. . . .
. . . [Appellant] failed to pay to the Anderson County Community Supervision and Corrections Department a supervision fee of $45.00 per month for a total of $405.00 in arrears.
. . . .
. . . [Appellant] failed to pay to the Anderson County Community Supervision and Corrections Department a court cost of $273.00 at the rate of $6.00 per month, a total of $60.00 in arrears.
. . . .
. . . [Appellant] failed to pay $50.00 for the benefit of the Anderson County Crime Stoppers within 60 days [of the date of her community supervision order].
. . . [Appellant] failed to pay restitution to the Anderson County Community Supervision and Corrections Department in monthly installments of $62.00 each, between the first and tenth day of the month, a total of $620.00 in arrears.On October 19, 2006, the trial court conducted a hearing on the State's motion. Appellant pleaded "not true" to the allegations in the State's motion. Following the presentation of evidence and argument of counsel, the trial court found all allegations in the State's motion to be true, revoked Appellant's community supervision, and sentenced Appellant to confinement for two years. This appeal followed.